Replication is more than hitting the lottery twice

J.B. Asendorpf, M. Conner, F. de Fruyt, J. de Houwer, J.J.A. Denissen, K. Fiedler, S. Fiedler, D.C. Funder, R. Kliegl, B.A. Nosek, M. Perugini, B.W. Roberts, M. Schmitt, M.A.G. van Aken, H. Weber, J.M. Wicherts

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

263 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The main goal of our target article was to provide concrete recommendations for improving the replicability of research findings. Most of the comments focus on this point. In addition, a few comments were concerned with the distinction between replicability and generalizability and the role of theory in replication. We address all comments within the conceptual structure of the target article, and hope to convince readers that replication in psychological science amounts to much more than hitting the lottery twice.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)138-144
JournalEuropean Journal of Personality
Volume27
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2013

    Fingerprint

Cite this

Asendorpf, J. B., Conner, M., de Fruyt, F., de Houwer, J., Denissen, J. J. A., Fiedler, K., Fiedler, S., Funder, D. C., Kliegl, R., Nosek, B. A., Perugini, M., Roberts, B. W., Schmitt, M., van Aken, M. A. G., Weber, H., & Wicherts, J. M. (2013). Replication is more than hitting the lottery twice. European Journal of Personality, 27(2), 138-144.