Researching health care as a meaningful practice: Toward a nondualistic view on evidence for qualitative research

Els van Wijngaarden*, J.W. van der Meide, Karin Dahlberg

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

80 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Being able to describe how research findings become evidence is crucial in providing a justification for all kinds of research findings. However, qualitative researchers in health care, including those who conduct phenomenological research, are usually fairly modest when it comes qualifying their research findings as such. We advocate a view of evidence for phenomenological research, an approach that is rooted in philosophy of science, including perspectives of ontology, epistemology, and methodology. We suggest that phenomenology can become an exemplar for how qualitative research can make convincing arguments and thus can be better appreciated. In this article, we present a philosophical foundation for phenomenological evidence by exploring the notions of objectivity, validity, and generalizability in terms of openness, meaning, and essence.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1738-1747
JournalQualitative Health Research
Volume27
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Keywords

  • evidence
  • qualitative research
  • phenomenology
  • objectivity
  • validity
  • generalizability
  • EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE
  • ELDERLY-PEOPLE
  • PHENOMENOLOGY
  • CRITERIA
  • DEATH

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Researching health care as a meaningful practice: Toward a nondualistic view on evidence for qualitative research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this