Respiratory Biofeedback Does Not Facilitate Lowering Arousal in Meditation Through Virtual Reality

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

The current study examined the effectiveness of respiratory biofeedback in lowering subjective and objective arousal after stress. Participants were presented with a meditation session in virtual reality while subjective and objective arousal were measured, the latter measured through ECG and EEG. Three conditions were used: (a) a respiratory biofeedback condition, in which visual feedback was paired to breathing; (b) a control feedback placebo condition, in which visual feedback was not paired to breathing; and (c) a control no-feedback condition, in which no visual feedback was used. Subjective and objective arousal decreased during meditation after stress in all conditions, demonstrating recovery after stress during meditation in virtual reality. However, the reduction in arousal (on all outcome measures combined and heart rate specifically) was largest in the control feedback placebo condition, in which no biofeedback was used, indicating that respiratory biofeedback had no additional value in reducing arousal. The findings of the current study highlight the importance of including a control feedback placebo condition in order to establish the exact additional value of biofeedback and offer insights in applying cost-effective virtual reality meditation training.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)51-59
JournalApplied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback
Volume44
Issue number1
Early online date2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Fingerprint

Meditation
Sensory Feedback
Placebos
Electroencephalography
Electrocardiography

Cite this

@article{db45e3259e07441d8aa4061fe8887970,
title = "Respiratory Biofeedback Does Not Facilitate Lowering Arousal in Meditation Through Virtual Reality",
abstract = "The current study examined the effectiveness of respiratory biofeedback in lowering subjective and objective arousal after stress. Participants were presented with a meditation session in virtual reality while subjective and objective arousal were measured, the latter measured through ECG and EEG. Three conditions were used: (a) a respiratory biofeedback condition, in which visual feedback was paired to breathing; (b) a control feedback placebo condition, in which visual feedback was not paired to breathing; and (c) a control no-feedback condition, in which no visual feedback was used. Subjective and objective arousal decreased during meditation after stress in all conditions, demonstrating recovery after stress during meditation in virtual reality. However, the reduction in arousal (on all outcome measures combined and heart rate specifically) was largest in the control feedback placebo condition, in which no biofeedback was used, indicating that respiratory biofeedback had no additional value in reducing arousal. The findings of the current study highlight the importance of including a control feedback placebo condition in order to establish the exact additional value of biofeedback and offer insights in applying cost-effective virtual reality meditation training.",
author = "Tinga, {Angelica M} and Ivan Nykl{\'i}ček and Jansen, {Michel P} and {de Back}, {Tycho T} and Louwerse, {Max M}",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1007/s10484-018-9421-5",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "51--59",
journal = "Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback",
issn = "1090-0586",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1",

}

Respiratory Biofeedback Does Not Facilitate Lowering Arousal in Meditation Through Virtual Reality. / Tinga, Angelica M; Nyklíček, Ivan; Jansen, Michel P; de Back, Tycho T; Louwerse, Max M.

In: Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, Vol. 44, No. 1, 2019, p. 51-59.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Respiratory Biofeedback Does Not Facilitate Lowering Arousal in Meditation Through Virtual Reality

AU - Tinga, Angelica M

AU - Nyklíček, Ivan

AU - Jansen, Michel P

AU - de Back, Tycho T

AU - Louwerse, Max M

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - The current study examined the effectiveness of respiratory biofeedback in lowering subjective and objective arousal after stress. Participants were presented with a meditation session in virtual reality while subjective and objective arousal were measured, the latter measured through ECG and EEG. Three conditions were used: (a) a respiratory biofeedback condition, in which visual feedback was paired to breathing; (b) a control feedback placebo condition, in which visual feedback was not paired to breathing; and (c) a control no-feedback condition, in which no visual feedback was used. Subjective and objective arousal decreased during meditation after stress in all conditions, demonstrating recovery after stress during meditation in virtual reality. However, the reduction in arousal (on all outcome measures combined and heart rate specifically) was largest in the control feedback placebo condition, in which no biofeedback was used, indicating that respiratory biofeedback had no additional value in reducing arousal. The findings of the current study highlight the importance of including a control feedback placebo condition in order to establish the exact additional value of biofeedback and offer insights in applying cost-effective virtual reality meditation training.

AB - The current study examined the effectiveness of respiratory biofeedback in lowering subjective and objective arousal after stress. Participants were presented with a meditation session in virtual reality while subjective and objective arousal were measured, the latter measured through ECG and EEG. Three conditions were used: (a) a respiratory biofeedback condition, in which visual feedback was paired to breathing; (b) a control feedback placebo condition, in which visual feedback was not paired to breathing; and (c) a control no-feedback condition, in which no visual feedback was used. Subjective and objective arousal decreased during meditation after stress in all conditions, demonstrating recovery after stress during meditation in virtual reality. However, the reduction in arousal (on all outcome measures combined and heart rate specifically) was largest in the control feedback placebo condition, in which no biofeedback was used, indicating that respiratory biofeedback had no additional value in reducing arousal. The findings of the current study highlight the importance of including a control feedback placebo condition in order to establish the exact additional value of biofeedback and offer insights in applying cost-effective virtual reality meditation training.

U2 - 10.1007/s10484-018-9421-5

DO - 10.1007/s10484-018-9421-5

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 51

EP - 59

JO - Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback

JF - Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback

SN - 1090-0586

IS - 1

ER -