Responding to social and symbolic extrafoveal cues

cue shape trumps biological relevance

Frouke Hermens, Markus Bindemann, A Mike Burton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Social cues presented at visual fixation have been shown to strongly influence an observer's attention and response selection. Here we ask whether the same holds for cues (initially) presented away from fixation, as cues are commonly perceived in natural vision. In six experiments, we show that extrafoveally presented cues with a distinct outline, such as pointing hands, rotated heads, and arrow cues result in strong cueing of responses (either to the cue itself, or a cued object). In contrast, cues without a clear outline, such as gazing eyes and direction words exert much weaker effects on participants' responses to a target cue. We also show that distraction effects on response times are relatively weak, but that strong interference effects can be obtained by measuring mouse trajectories. Eye tracking suggests that gaze cues are slower to respond to because their direction cannot easily be perceived in extrafoveal vision. Together, these data suggest that the strength of an extrafoveal cue is determined by the shape of the cue outline, rather than its biological relevance (i.e., whether the cue is provided by another human being), and that this shape effect is due to how easily the direction of a cue can be perceived in extrafoveal vision.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)24-42
Number of pages19
JournalPsychological Research = Psychologische Forschung: An international journal of perception, learning and communication
Volume81
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Cues
Fixation

Keywords

  • Adult
  • Attention/physiology
  • Cues
  • Eye Movements/physiology
  • Female
  • Fixation, Ocular/physiology
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Reaction Time/physiology

Cite this

@article{b703a75a67fe411185f3169dd4d4a660,
title = "Responding to social and symbolic extrafoveal cues: cue shape trumps biological relevance",
abstract = "Social cues presented at visual fixation have been shown to strongly influence an observer's attention and response selection. Here we ask whether the same holds for cues (initially) presented away from fixation, as cues are commonly perceived in natural vision. In six experiments, we show that extrafoveally presented cues with a distinct outline, such as pointing hands, rotated heads, and arrow cues result in strong cueing of responses (either to the cue itself, or a cued object). In contrast, cues without a clear outline, such as gazing eyes and direction words exert much weaker effects on participants' responses to a target cue. We also show that distraction effects on response times are relatively weak, but that strong interference effects can be obtained by measuring mouse trajectories. Eye tracking suggests that gaze cues are slower to respond to because their direction cannot easily be perceived in extrafoveal vision. Together, these data suggest that the strength of an extrafoveal cue is determined by the shape of the cue outline, rather than its biological relevance (i.e., whether the cue is provided by another human being), and that this shape effect is due to how easily the direction of a cue can be perceived in extrafoveal vision.",
keywords = "Adult, Attention/physiology, Cues, Eye Movements/physiology, Female, Fixation, Ocular/physiology, Humans, Male, Reaction Time/physiology",
author = "Frouke Hermens and Markus Bindemann and {Mike Burton}, A",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00426-015-0733-2",
language = "English",
volume = "81",
pages = "24--42",
journal = "Psychological Research = Psychologische Forschung: An international journal of perception, learning and communication",
issn = "0340-0727",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "1",

}

Responding to social and symbolic extrafoveal cues : cue shape trumps biological relevance. / Hermens, Frouke; Bindemann, Markus; Mike Burton, A.

In: Psychological Research = Psychologische Forschung: An international journal of perception, learning and communication, Vol. 81, No. 1, 01.2017, p. 24-42.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Responding to social and symbolic extrafoveal cues

T2 - cue shape trumps biological relevance

AU - Hermens, Frouke

AU - Bindemann, Markus

AU - Mike Burton, A

PY - 2017/1

Y1 - 2017/1

N2 - Social cues presented at visual fixation have been shown to strongly influence an observer's attention and response selection. Here we ask whether the same holds for cues (initially) presented away from fixation, as cues are commonly perceived in natural vision. In six experiments, we show that extrafoveally presented cues with a distinct outline, such as pointing hands, rotated heads, and arrow cues result in strong cueing of responses (either to the cue itself, or a cued object). In contrast, cues without a clear outline, such as gazing eyes and direction words exert much weaker effects on participants' responses to a target cue. We also show that distraction effects on response times are relatively weak, but that strong interference effects can be obtained by measuring mouse trajectories. Eye tracking suggests that gaze cues are slower to respond to because their direction cannot easily be perceived in extrafoveal vision. Together, these data suggest that the strength of an extrafoveal cue is determined by the shape of the cue outline, rather than its biological relevance (i.e., whether the cue is provided by another human being), and that this shape effect is due to how easily the direction of a cue can be perceived in extrafoveal vision.

AB - Social cues presented at visual fixation have been shown to strongly influence an observer's attention and response selection. Here we ask whether the same holds for cues (initially) presented away from fixation, as cues are commonly perceived in natural vision. In six experiments, we show that extrafoveally presented cues with a distinct outline, such as pointing hands, rotated heads, and arrow cues result in strong cueing of responses (either to the cue itself, or a cued object). In contrast, cues without a clear outline, such as gazing eyes and direction words exert much weaker effects on participants' responses to a target cue. We also show that distraction effects on response times are relatively weak, but that strong interference effects can be obtained by measuring mouse trajectories. Eye tracking suggests that gaze cues are slower to respond to because their direction cannot easily be perceived in extrafoveal vision. Together, these data suggest that the strength of an extrafoveal cue is determined by the shape of the cue outline, rather than its biological relevance (i.e., whether the cue is provided by another human being), and that this shape effect is due to how easily the direction of a cue can be perceived in extrafoveal vision.

KW - Adult

KW - Attention/physiology

KW - Cues

KW - Eye Movements/physiology

KW - Female

KW - Fixation, Ocular/physiology

KW - Humans

KW - Male

KW - Reaction Time/physiology

U2 - 10.1007/s00426-015-0733-2

DO - 10.1007/s00426-015-0733-2

M3 - Article

VL - 81

SP - 24

EP - 42

JO - Psychological Research = Psychologische Forschung: An international journal of perception, learning and communication

JF - Psychological Research = Psychologische Forschung: An international journal of perception, learning and communication

SN - 0340-0727

IS - 1

ER -