Response inconsistency of patient-reported symptoms as a predictor of discrepancy between patient and clinician reported depression severity

J.M. Conijn, W.H.M. Emons, B.F. Page, K. Sijtsma, W. van der Does, I.V. Carlier, E.J. Giltay

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the extent to which discrepancy between self-reported and clinician-rated severity of depression are due to inconsistent self-reports. Response inconsistency threatens the validity of the test score. We used data from a large sample of outpatients (N = 5,959) who completed the self-report Beck Depression Inventory–II (BDI-II) and the clinician-rated Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). We used item response theory based person-fit analysis to quantify the inconsistency of the self-report item scores. Inconsistency was weakly positively related to patient–clinician discrepancy (i.e., higher BDI-II scores relative to MADRS scores). The mediating effect of response inconsistency in the relationship between discrepancy and demographic (e.g., ethnic origin) and clinical variables (e.g., cognitive problems) was negligible. The small direct and mediating effects of response inconsistency suggest that inaccurate patient self-reports are not a major cause of patient–clinician discrepancy in outpatient samples. Future research should investigate the role of clinician biases in explaining clinician–patient discrepancy.
Keywords: Beck Depression Inventory–II; Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale; clinician-rated depression; person-fit analysis; response inconsistency; self-report and clinician-report discrepancy; self-report depression
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)917-928
JournalAssessment
Volume25
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Fingerprint

Self Report
Outpatients

Keywords

  • APPROPRIATENESS MEASUREMENT
  • Beck Depression Inventory-II
  • DISORDER
  • INVENTORY-II
  • Montgomery-angstrom sberg Depression Rating Scale
  • OBSERVER RATINGS
  • PERSON-FIT
  • RATED MEASURES
  • RATING-SCALES
  • RELIABILITY
  • SELF-REPORT
  • VALIDATION
  • clinician-rated depression
  • person-fit analysis
  • response inconsistency
  • self-report and clinician-report discrepancy
  • self-report depression

Cite this

Conijn, J. M., Emons, W. H. M., Page, B. F., Sijtsma, K., van der Does, W., Carlier, I. V., & Giltay, E. J. (2018). Response inconsistency of patient-reported symptoms as a predictor of discrepancy between patient and clinician reported depression severity. Assessment, 25(7), 917-928. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191116666949
Conijn, J.M. ; Emons, W.H.M. ; Page, B.F. ; Sijtsma, K. ; van der Does, W. ; Carlier, I.V. ; Giltay, E.J. / Response inconsistency of patient-reported symptoms as a predictor of discrepancy between patient and clinician reported depression severity. In: Assessment. 2018 ; Vol. 25, No. 7. pp. 917-928.
@article{b2efcc870277428dae9a69172a0c2c17,
title = "Response inconsistency of patient-reported symptoms as a predictor of discrepancy between patient and clinician reported depression severity",
abstract = "The aim of this study was to assess the extent to which discrepancy between self-reported and clinician-rated severity of depression are due to inconsistent self-reports. Response inconsistency threatens the validity of the test score. We used data from a large sample of outpatients (N = 5,959) who completed the self-report Beck Depression Inventory–II (BDI-II) and the clinician-rated Montgomery–{\AA}sberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). We used item response theory based person-fit analysis to quantify the inconsistency of the self-report item scores. Inconsistency was weakly positively related to patient–clinician discrepancy (i.e., higher BDI-II scores relative to MADRS scores). The mediating effect of response inconsistency in the relationship between discrepancy and demographic (e.g., ethnic origin) and clinical variables (e.g., cognitive problems) was negligible. The small direct and mediating effects of response inconsistency suggest that inaccurate patient self-reports are not a major cause of patient–clinician discrepancy in outpatient samples. Future research should investigate the role of clinician biases in explaining clinician–patient discrepancy.Keywords: Beck Depression Inventory–II; Montgomery–{\AA}sberg Depression Rating Scale; clinician-rated depression; person-fit analysis; response inconsistency; self-report and clinician-report discrepancy; self-report depression",
keywords = "APPROPRIATENESS MEASUREMENT, Beck Depression Inventory-II, DISORDER, INVENTORY-II, Montgomery-angstrom sberg Depression Rating Scale, OBSERVER RATINGS, PERSON-FIT, RATED MEASURES, RATING-SCALES, RELIABILITY, SELF-REPORT, VALIDATION, clinician-rated depression, person-fit analysis, response inconsistency, self-report and clinician-report discrepancy, self-report depression",
author = "J.M. Conijn and W.H.M. Emons and B.F. Page and K. Sijtsma and {van der Does}, W. and I.V. Carlier and E.J. Giltay",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1177/1073191116666949",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "917--928",
journal = "Assessment",
issn = "1073-1911",
publisher = "Sage Publications, Inc.",
number = "7",

}

Conijn, JM, Emons, WHM, Page, BF, Sijtsma, K, van der Does, W, Carlier, IV & Giltay, EJ 2018, 'Response inconsistency of patient-reported symptoms as a predictor of discrepancy between patient and clinician reported depression severity', Assessment, vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 917-928. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191116666949

Response inconsistency of patient-reported symptoms as a predictor of discrepancy between patient and clinician reported depression severity. / Conijn, J.M.; Emons, W.H.M.; Page, B.F.; Sijtsma, K.; van der Does, W.; Carlier, I.V.; Giltay, E.J.

In: Assessment, Vol. 25, No. 7, 2018, p. 917-928.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Response inconsistency of patient-reported symptoms as a predictor of discrepancy between patient and clinician reported depression severity

AU - Conijn, J.M.

AU - Emons, W.H.M.

AU - Page, B.F.

AU - Sijtsma, K.

AU - van der Does, W.

AU - Carlier, I.V.

AU - Giltay, E.J.

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - The aim of this study was to assess the extent to which discrepancy between self-reported and clinician-rated severity of depression are due to inconsistent self-reports. Response inconsistency threatens the validity of the test score. We used data from a large sample of outpatients (N = 5,959) who completed the self-report Beck Depression Inventory–II (BDI-II) and the clinician-rated Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). We used item response theory based person-fit analysis to quantify the inconsistency of the self-report item scores. Inconsistency was weakly positively related to patient–clinician discrepancy (i.e., higher BDI-II scores relative to MADRS scores). The mediating effect of response inconsistency in the relationship between discrepancy and demographic (e.g., ethnic origin) and clinical variables (e.g., cognitive problems) was negligible. The small direct and mediating effects of response inconsistency suggest that inaccurate patient self-reports are not a major cause of patient–clinician discrepancy in outpatient samples. Future research should investigate the role of clinician biases in explaining clinician–patient discrepancy.Keywords: Beck Depression Inventory–II; Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale; clinician-rated depression; person-fit analysis; response inconsistency; self-report and clinician-report discrepancy; self-report depression

AB - The aim of this study was to assess the extent to which discrepancy between self-reported and clinician-rated severity of depression are due to inconsistent self-reports. Response inconsistency threatens the validity of the test score. We used data from a large sample of outpatients (N = 5,959) who completed the self-report Beck Depression Inventory–II (BDI-II) and the clinician-rated Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). We used item response theory based person-fit analysis to quantify the inconsistency of the self-report item scores. Inconsistency was weakly positively related to patient–clinician discrepancy (i.e., higher BDI-II scores relative to MADRS scores). The mediating effect of response inconsistency in the relationship between discrepancy and demographic (e.g., ethnic origin) and clinical variables (e.g., cognitive problems) was negligible. The small direct and mediating effects of response inconsistency suggest that inaccurate patient self-reports are not a major cause of patient–clinician discrepancy in outpatient samples. Future research should investigate the role of clinician biases in explaining clinician–patient discrepancy.Keywords: Beck Depression Inventory–II; Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale; clinician-rated depression; person-fit analysis; response inconsistency; self-report and clinician-report discrepancy; self-report depression

KW - APPROPRIATENESS MEASUREMENT

KW - Beck Depression Inventory-II

KW - DISORDER

KW - INVENTORY-II

KW - Montgomery-angstrom sberg Depression Rating Scale

KW - OBSERVER RATINGS

KW - PERSON-FIT

KW - RATED MEASURES

KW - RATING-SCALES

KW - RELIABILITY

KW - SELF-REPORT

KW - VALIDATION

KW - clinician-rated depression

KW - person-fit analysis

KW - response inconsistency

KW - self-report and clinician-report discrepancy

KW - self-report depression

U2 - 10.1177/1073191116666949

DO - 10.1177/1073191116666949

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 917

EP - 928

JO - Assessment

JF - Assessment

SN - 1073-1911

IS - 7

ER -