Rethinking Moral Responsibility

A.H. Vedder

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Questions regarding the moral responsibility of Internet access and service providers relating to possible negative aspects of information on the Internet call for a reassessment of the ways in which we think about attributing blame, guilt, and duties of reparation and compensation. They invite us to borrow something similar to the idea of strict liability from the legal sphere and to introduce it to morality and ethical theory. Lifting such a category from the domain of law and introducing it to ethics, however, is a difficult thing. Doing so seems to conflict with some broadly shared and deeply felt intuitions regarding the individuality of responsibility and the relationship between responsibility and guilt. These convictions coincide with some basic ideas in Kantian moral theory and the ascriptive theory that they entail. In this paper, it is shown that the seriousness of the problems to which the proposed responsibilities relate does not seem to leave room for resignation or aloofness. Furthermore, it is shown that the idea of strict liability is compatible with our traditional ways of attributing moral responsibility in more respects than one may think at first sight.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings for Computer Ethics
Subtitle of host publicationPhilosophical Enquiry (Cepe 2000)
EditorsD. Johnson, J. Moor, H. Tavani
Place of PublicationHanover, New Hampshire
PublisherDartmouth
Pages317-328
Number of pages12
Publication statusPublished - 2000

Fingerprint

Responsibility
Moral Responsibility
World Wide Web
Guilt
Liability
Conviction
Immanuel Kant
Resignation
Ethical Theory
Reparation
Morality
Individuality
Intuition
Moral Theory

Cite this

Vedder, A. H. (2000). Rethinking Moral Responsibility. In D. Johnson, J. Moor, & H. Tavani (Eds.), Proceedings for Computer Ethics: Philosophical Enquiry (Cepe 2000) (pp. 317-328). Hanover, New Hampshire: Dartmouth.
Vedder, A.H. / Rethinking Moral Responsibility. Proceedings for Computer Ethics: Philosophical Enquiry (Cepe 2000). editor / D. Johnson ; J. Moor ; H. Tavani. Hanover, New Hampshire : Dartmouth, 2000. pp. 317-328
@inbook{7a6eb717bc654f04aee2d866d88fa815,
title = "Rethinking Moral Responsibility",
abstract = "Questions regarding the moral responsibility of Internet access and service providers relating to possible negative aspects of information on the Internet call for a reassessment of the ways in which we think about attributing blame, guilt, and duties of reparation and compensation. They invite us to borrow something similar to the idea of strict liability from the legal sphere and to introduce it to morality and ethical theory. Lifting such a category from the domain of law and introducing it to ethics, however, is a difficult thing. Doing so seems to conflict with some broadly shared and deeply felt intuitions regarding the individuality of responsibility and the relationship between responsibility and guilt. These convictions coincide with some basic ideas in Kantian moral theory and the ascriptive theory that they entail. In this paper, it is shown that the seriousness of the problems to which the proposed responsibilities relate does not seem to leave room for resignation or aloofness. Furthermore, it is shown that the idea of strict liability is compatible with our traditional ways of attributing moral responsibility in more respects than one may think at first sight.",
author = "A.H. Vedder",
note = "Pagination: 12",
year = "2000",
language = "English",
pages = "317--328",
editor = "D. Johnson and J. Moor and H. Tavani",
booktitle = "Proceedings for Computer Ethics",
publisher = "Dartmouth",

}

Vedder, AH 2000, Rethinking Moral Responsibility. in D Johnson, J Moor & H Tavani (eds), Proceedings for Computer Ethics: Philosophical Enquiry (Cepe 2000). Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire, pp. 317-328.

Rethinking Moral Responsibility. / Vedder, A.H.

Proceedings for Computer Ethics: Philosophical Enquiry (Cepe 2000). ed. / D. Johnson; J. Moor; H. Tavani. Hanover, New Hampshire : Dartmouth, 2000. p. 317-328.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterScientificpeer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - Rethinking Moral Responsibility

AU - Vedder, A.H.

N1 - Pagination: 12

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - Questions regarding the moral responsibility of Internet access and service providers relating to possible negative aspects of information on the Internet call for a reassessment of the ways in which we think about attributing blame, guilt, and duties of reparation and compensation. They invite us to borrow something similar to the idea of strict liability from the legal sphere and to introduce it to morality and ethical theory. Lifting such a category from the domain of law and introducing it to ethics, however, is a difficult thing. Doing so seems to conflict with some broadly shared and deeply felt intuitions regarding the individuality of responsibility and the relationship between responsibility and guilt. These convictions coincide with some basic ideas in Kantian moral theory and the ascriptive theory that they entail. In this paper, it is shown that the seriousness of the problems to which the proposed responsibilities relate does not seem to leave room for resignation or aloofness. Furthermore, it is shown that the idea of strict liability is compatible with our traditional ways of attributing moral responsibility in more respects than one may think at first sight.

AB - Questions regarding the moral responsibility of Internet access and service providers relating to possible negative aspects of information on the Internet call for a reassessment of the ways in which we think about attributing blame, guilt, and duties of reparation and compensation. They invite us to borrow something similar to the idea of strict liability from the legal sphere and to introduce it to morality and ethical theory. Lifting such a category from the domain of law and introducing it to ethics, however, is a difficult thing. Doing so seems to conflict with some broadly shared and deeply felt intuitions regarding the individuality of responsibility and the relationship between responsibility and guilt. These convictions coincide with some basic ideas in Kantian moral theory and the ascriptive theory that they entail. In this paper, it is shown that the seriousness of the problems to which the proposed responsibilities relate does not seem to leave room for resignation or aloofness. Furthermore, it is shown that the idea of strict liability is compatible with our traditional ways of attributing moral responsibility in more respects than one may think at first sight.

M3 - Chapter

SP - 317

EP - 328

BT - Proceedings for Computer Ethics

A2 - Johnson, D.

A2 - Moor, J.

A2 - Tavani, H.

PB - Dartmouth

CY - Hanover, New Hampshire

ER -

Vedder AH. Rethinking Moral Responsibility. In Johnson D, Moor J, Tavani H, editors, Proceedings for Computer Ethics: Philosophical Enquiry (Cepe 2000). Hanover, New Hampshire: Dartmouth. 2000. p. 317-328