Review of the book Les frères ennemis: René Caillois et Claude Lévi-Strauss, M. Panoff, 1996

R.H.A. Corbey

Review of the book Les frères ennemis: René Caillois et Claude Lévi-Strauss, M. Panoff, 1996

R.H.A. Corbey

Research output: Contribution to journal › Book/Film/Article review › Other research output

126 Downloads (Pure)

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	178
Journal	The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute
Volume	2
Issue number	1
Publication status	Published - 1996

Access to Document

RC15

Natural order and social order: continuity or rupture?
Corbey, R. H. A. (Researcher)
1/01/96 → 31/12/00
Project: Research project

Cite this

@article{8b0a50df45454fc89b8fd8d1ba9275bc,

title = "Review of the book Les fr{\`e}res ennemis: Ren{\'e} Caillois et Claude L{\'e}vi-Strauss, M. Panoff, 1996",

author = "R.H.A. Corbey",

note = "Reviewed items: Title: Les fr{\`e}res ennemis: Ren{\'e} Caillois et Claude L{\'e}vi-Strauss Author(s): M. Panoff Year published: 1996 Number of pages: 193 Publisher: Payot \& Rivages Place of publication: Parijs ISBN: 2228886904",

year = "1996",

language = "English",

volume = "2",

pages = "178",

journal = "The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute",

issn = "0025-1496",

publisher = "Royal Anthropological Institute",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Review of the book Les frères ennemis

T2 - René Caillois et Claude Lévi-Strauss, M. Panoff, 1996

AU - Corbey, R.H.A.

N1 - Reviewed items: Title: Les frères ennemis: René Caillois et Claude Lévi-Strauss Author(s): M. Panoff Year published: 1996 Number of pages: 193 Publisher: Payot & Rivages Place of publication: Parijs ISBN: 2228886904

PY - 1996

Y1 - 1996

M3 - Book/Film/Article review

SN - 0025-1496

VL - 2

SP - 178

JO - The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute

JF - The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute

IS - 1

ER -

Review of the book Les frères ennemis: René Caillois et Claude Lévi-Strauss, M. Panoff, 1996

Access to Document

Projects

Natural order and social order: continuity or rupture?

Cite this