Rhineland exit?

A.L. Bovenberg, C.N. Teulings

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

We argue in favour of the shareholder model of the firm because assigning the full surplus of the firm to shareholders provides the best possible social insurance by diversifying firmspecific risks on capital markets. Coordination in wage bargaining and collective norms on what is proper compensation play an important role in reducing the claim of workers on the firm’s surplus. In Denmark, workers bear less firm-specific risk than workers in the United States do. Collective action thus has an important role to play. Politicians, however, face the temptation to please voters and incumbent workers with short-run gains at the expense of exposing workers to firm-specific risks and reducing future job creation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)710-726
JournalInternational Tax and Public Finance
Volume16
Issue number5
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Rhineland exit?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Bovenberg, A. L., & Teulings, C. N. (2009). Rhineland exit? International Tax and Public Finance, 16(5), 710-726.