Ricoeur and Anglo-American Political Philosophy

Liberalism, Communitarianism, and Republicanism

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

It is a common conviction that Ricoeur’s main contribution to Anglo-American political philosophy is to be found in the dialogue he tried to establish between liberalism and communitarianism. I argue that the depth of Ricoeur’s political philosophy is better served by situating it not only with regard to liberalism and communitarianism, but especially with regard to republicanism. This article shows how Ricoeur’s political philosophy—with its focus on the so-called “political paradox”—contains the main components of contemporary republicanism, with its stress on active citizenship and mixed constitution as necessary prerequisites for freedom, interpreted as the absence of illegitimate domination. I also argue that there are, however, significant differences between Ricoeur’s theory and the main currents in contemporary republicanism, civic republicanism, and civic humanism, because of his reliance on a positive conception of freedom on the one hand and his emphasis on the fragility of politics on the other hand.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)803-821
JournalPhilosophy Today
Volume62
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Fingerprint

Republicanism
Anglo-American
Political philosophy
Liberalism
Communitarianism
Civics
Conviction
Conception
Constitution
Humanism
Domination
Reliance
Citizenship

Cite this

@article{e2a18e4f6d7b4f49a002f4c8b42222bf,
title = "Ricoeur and Anglo-American Political Philosophy: Liberalism, Communitarianism, and Republicanism",
abstract = "It is a common conviction that Ricoeur’s main contribution to Anglo-American political philosophy is to be found in the dialogue he tried to establish between liberalism and communitarianism. I argue that the depth of Ricoeur’s political philosophy is better served by situating it not only with regard to liberalism and communitarianism, but especially with regard to republicanism. This article shows how Ricoeur’s political philosophy—with its focus on the so-called “political paradox”—contains the main components of contemporary republicanism, with its stress on active citizenship and mixed constitution as necessary prerequisites for freedom, interpreted as the absence of illegitimate domination. I also argue that there are, however, significant differences between Ricoeur’s theory and the main currents in contemporary republicanism, civic republicanism, and civic humanism, because of his reliance on a positive conception of freedom on the one hand and his emphasis on the fragility of politics on the other hand.",
author = "Dries Deweer",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.5840/philtoday20181119236",
language = "English",
volume = "62",
pages = "803--821",
journal = "Philosophy Today",
issn = "0031-8256",
publisher = "Philosophy Documentation Center",
number = "3",

}

Ricoeur and Anglo-American Political Philosophy : Liberalism, Communitarianism, and Republicanism. / Deweer, Dries.

In: Philosophy Today, Vol. 62, No. 3, 2018, p. 803-821.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ricoeur and Anglo-American Political Philosophy

T2 - Liberalism, Communitarianism, and Republicanism

AU - Deweer, Dries

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - It is a common conviction that Ricoeur’s main contribution to Anglo-American political philosophy is to be found in the dialogue he tried to establish between liberalism and communitarianism. I argue that the depth of Ricoeur’s political philosophy is better served by situating it not only with regard to liberalism and communitarianism, but especially with regard to republicanism. This article shows how Ricoeur’s political philosophy—with its focus on the so-called “political paradox”—contains the main components of contemporary republicanism, with its stress on active citizenship and mixed constitution as necessary prerequisites for freedom, interpreted as the absence of illegitimate domination. I also argue that there are, however, significant differences between Ricoeur’s theory and the main currents in contemporary republicanism, civic republicanism, and civic humanism, because of his reliance on a positive conception of freedom on the one hand and his emphasis on the fragility of politics on the other hand.

AB - It is a common conviction that Ricoeur’s main contribution to Anglo-American political philosophy is to be found in the dialogue he tried to establish between liberalism and communitarianism. I argue that the depth of Ricoeur’s political philosophy is better served by situating it not only with regard to liberalism and communitarianism, but especially with regard to republicanism. This article shows how Ricoeur’s political philosophy—with its focus on the so-called “political paradox”—contains the main components of contemporary republicanism, with its stress on active citizenship and mixed constitution as necessary prerequisites for freedom, interpreted as the absence of illegitimate domination. I also argue that there are, however, significant differences between Ricoeur’s theory and the main currents in contemporary republicanism, civic republicanism, and civic humanism, because of his reliance on a positive conception of freedom on the one hand and his emphasis on the fragility of politics on the other hand.

U2 - 10.5840/philtoday20181119236

DO - 10.5840/philtoday20181119236

M3 - Article

VL - 62

SP - 803

EP - 821

JO - Philosophy Today

JF - Philosophy Today

SN - 0031-8256

IS - 3

ER -