Risk aversion vs. the Omega ratio: Consistency results

Sven Balder, Nikolaus Schweizer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper clarifies when the Omega ratio and related performance measures are consistent with second order stochastic dominance and when they are not. To avoid consistency problems, the threshold parameter in the ratio should be chosen as the expected return of some benchmark – as is commonly done in the Sharpe ratio. When the ratio is below one, its value should be discarded – just like a negative Sharpe ratio. Finally, we show that a class of closely related performance measures has both better consistency properties and greater flexibility.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)78-84
JournalFinance research letters
Volume21
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2017

Keywords

  • performance measurement
  • Stochastic dominance
  • Omega ratio
  • Sharpe ratio

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Risk aversion vs. the Omega ratio: Consistency results'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this