In this paper we show that free entry decisions may be socially inefficient, even in a perfectly competitive homogeneous goods market with non-lumpy investments. In our model, inefficient entry decisions are the result of risk-aversion of incumbent producers and consumers, combined with incomplete financial markets which limit risk-sharing between market actors. Investments in productive assets affect the distribution of equilibrium prices and quantities, and create risk spillovers. From a societal perspective, entrants under-invest in technologies that would reduce systemic sector risk, and may over-invest in risk-increasing technologies. The inefficiency is shown to disappear when a complete financial market of tradable risk-sharing instruments is available, although the introduction of any individual tradable instrument may actually decrease efficiency. We therefore believe that sectors without well-developed financial markets will benefit from sector-specific regulation of investment decisions.
|Place of Publication||Tilburg|
|Publication status||Published - 2011|
|Name||TILEC Discussion Paper|
- investments in productive assets
- systemic risk
- risk spillovers
Willems, B., & Morbee, J. (2011). Risk Spillovers and Hedging: Why Do Firms Invest Too Much in Systemic Risk? (TILEC Discussion Paper; Vol. 2011-029). TILEC. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1850543