Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Ritual Authenticity as Social Criticism

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterScientificpeer-review

    Abstract

    Rituals are often used as opportunities for self-reflection and identity construction. The Camino to Santiago de Compostela, which has become a singularly popular pilgrimage since the late ‘80s of the last century, is an example of a ritual that is explicitly used to gain a deeper understanding of one’s identity through distancing oneself from daily life and creating a space of contemplation. Implicit in this function of rituals in general, and the pilgrimage to Santiago in particular, is the assumption that one is more authentic and closer to one’s true identity during the pilgrimage, than one is in daily life. The ritual self, as an idealized identity, functions thus as a critique on one’s regular cultural identity. This critique also plays a role in the construction of a so-called authentic pilgrim identity, which creates a hierarchy in the ways the pilgrim identity can be appropriated by individuals. This presentation proposes to investigate both the ideal, ritual identity and the implicit critique towards the cultural dynamics that force the pilgrim to ‘not be her/himself’ in daily life.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationThe Study of Culture through the Lens of Ritual
    EditorsPaul Post, Logan Sparks
    Place of PublicationGroningen/Amsterdam
    PublisherInstituut voor Christelijk Erfgoed/Instituut voor Liturgische en Rituele Studies
    ISBN (Print)9789036780056
    Publication statusPublished - 2015

    Publication series

    NameNetherlands Studies in Ritual and Liturgy
    PublisherInstitute for Ritual and Liturgical Studies
    Volume15
    ISSN (Print)1571-8808

    Keywords

    • Ritual
    • Identity
    • Pilgrimage
    • Camino
    • Santiago de Compostela
    • authenticity

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Ritual Authenticity as Social Criticism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this