Rule of law and legal epistemology

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionScientificpeer-review

Abstract

In the positivistic conception of law, sources of law (statute, precedent) are strictly distinguished from other legal materials such as doctrine. Courts as well as academia are, however, beginning to recognise the legal relevance of doctrine and case law of lower courts.
This acceptance of such epistemic sources is justified within the rule of law if we recognise that courts and legislators do not create law in a vacuum, but rather build on a prior body of legal knowledge. This is relevant to legal argumentation and legal methodology, as it explicates that we have to take epistemic sources into account. This approach is supported by the recent epistemological recognition of testimony as source of knowledge.
The epistemological approach to law offers an explanation to the recognition of precedents as source of law, and the authority of non-binding texts, thereby being suitable to a multi-level legal order where authority is more fluid than in traditional positivism.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationLegal argumentation and rule of law
EditorsEveline Feteris, Harm Kloosterhuis, José Plug, Carel Smith
Place of PublicationThe Hague
PublisherEleven International Publishing
Pages193-204
Number of pages12
ISBN (Electronic)978-94-6274-597-1
ISBN (Print)978-94-6236-702-0
Publication statusPublished - 26 Sep 2016

Fingerprint

constitutional state
source of law
epistemology
doctrine
legal order
positivism
Law
case law
argumentation
testimony
statute
acceptance
methodology
knowledge

Keywords

  • epistemology
  • legal method
  • doctrine

Cite this

Tjong Tjin Tai, E. (2016). Rule of law and legal epistemology. In E. Feteris, H. Kloosterhuis, J. Plug, & C. Smith (Eds.), Legal argumentation and rule of law (pp. 193-204). The Hague: Eleven International Publishing.
Tjong Tjin Tai, Eric. / Rule of law and legal epistemology. Legal argumentation and rule of law. editor / Eveline Feteris ; Harm Kloosterhuis ; José Plug ; Carel Smith. The Hague : Eleven International Publishing, 2016. pp. 193-204
@inproceedings{8897e4f9ca1c4172ada3b4a156ceda2c,
title = "Rule of law and legal epistemology",
abstract = "In the positivistic conception of law, sources of law (statute, precedent) are strictly distinguished from other legal materials such as doctrine. Courts as well as academia are, however, beginning to recognise the legal relevance of doctrine and case law of lower courts. This acceptance of such epistemic sources is justified within the rule of law if we recognise that courts and legislators do not create law in a vacuum, but rather build on a prior body of legal knowledge. This is relevant to legal argumentation and legal methodology, as it explicates that we have to take epistemic sources into account. This approach is supported by the recent epistemological recognition of testimony as source of knowledge. The epistemological approach to law offers an explanation to the recognition of precedents as source of law, and the authority of non-binding texts, thereby being suitable to a multi-level legal order where authority is more fluid than in traditional positivism.",
keywords = "epistemology, legal method, doctrine",
author = "{Tjong Tjin Tai}, Eric",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
day = "26",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-94-6236-702-0",
pages = "193--204",
editor = "Eveline Feteris and Harm Kloosterhuis and Jos{\'e} Plug and Carel Smith",
booktitle = "Legal argumentation and rule of law",
publisher = "Eleven International Publishing",

}

Tjong Tjin Tai, E 2016, Rule of law and legal epistemology. in E Feteris, H Kloosterhuis, J Plug & C Smith (eds), Legal argumentation and rule of law. Eleven International Publishing, The Hague, pp. 193-204.

Rule of law and legal epistemology. / Tjong Tjin Tai, Eric.

Legal argumentation and rule of law. ed. / Eveline Feteris; Harm Kloosterhuis; José Plug; Carel Smith. The Hague : Eleven International Publishing, 2016. p. 193-204.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionScientificpeer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - Rule of law and legal epistemology

AU - Tjong Tjin Tai, Eric

PY - 2016/9/26

Y1 - 2016/9/26

N2 - In the positivistic conception of law, sources of law (statute, precedent) are strictly distinguished from other legal materials such as doctrine. Courts as well as academia are, however, beginning to recognise the legal relevance of doctrine and case law of lower courts. This acceptance of such epistemic sources is justified within the rule of law if we recognise that courts and legislators do not create law in a vacuum, but rather build on a prior body of legal knowledge. This is relevant to legal argumentation and legal methodology, as it explicates that we have to take epistemic sources into account. This approach is supported by the recent epistemological recognition of testimony as source of knowledge. The epistemological approach to law offers an explanation to the recognition of precedents as source of law, and the authority of non-binding texts, thereby being suitable to a multi-level legal order where authority is more fluid than in traditional positivism.

AB - In the positivistic conception of law, sources of law (statute, precedent) are strictly distinguished from other legal materials such as doctrine. Courts as well as academia are, however, beginning to recognise the legal relevance of doctrine and case law of lower courts. This acceptance of such epistemic sources is justified within the rule of law if we recognise that courts and legislators do not create law in a vacuum, but rather build on a prior body of legal knowledge. This is relevant to legal argumentation and legal methodology, as it explicates that we have to take epistemic sources into account. This approach is supported by the recent epistemological recognition of testimony as source of knowledge. The epistemological approach to law offers an explanation to the recognition of precedents as source of law, and the authority of non-binding texts, thereby being suitable to a multi-level legal order where authority is more fluid than in traditional positivism.

KW - epistemology

KW - legal method

KW - doctrine

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 978-94-6236-702-0

SP - 193

EP - 204

BT - Legal argumentation and rule of law

A2 - Feteris, Eveline

A2 - Kloosterhuis, Harm

A2 - Plug, José

A2 - Smith, Carel

PB - Eleven International Publishing

CY - The Hague

ER -

Tjong Tjin Tai E. Rule of law and legal epistemology. In Feteris E, Kloosterhuis H, Plug J, Smith C, editors, Legal argumentation and rule of law. The Hague: Eleven International Publishing. 2016. p. 193-204