Abstract
Many people who perform paradigmatic examples of acts of supererogation claim that they could not have done otherwise. In this paper I will argue that these self-reports from moral exemplars present a challenge to the traditional view of supererogation as involving agential sacrifice. I will argue that the claims made by moral exemplars are plausibly understood as what Bernard Williams calls a ‘practical necessity’. I will then argue that this makes it implausible to view these acts as involving agential sacrifice.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 105-124 |
| Number of pages | 19 |
| Journal | Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplementary Volume |
| Volume | 77 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2015 |
Keywords
- Supererogation
- Sacrifice
- Moral Saint
- Moral hero
- Moral Philosophy
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Saints, Heroes and Moral Necessity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver