Sample size, number of categories and sampling assumptions: Exploring some differences between categorization and generalization

Andrew T Hendrickson, Amy Perfors, Danielle J Navarro, Keith Ransom

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Categorization and generalization are fundamentally related inference problems. Yet leading computational models of categorization (as exemplified by, e.g., Nosofsky, 1986) and generalization (as exemplified by, e.g., Tenenbaum and Griffiths, 2001) make qualitatively different predictions about how inference should change as a function of the number of items. Assuming all else is equal, categorization models predict that increasing the number of items in a category increases the chance of assigning a new item to that category; generalization models predict a decrease, or category tightening with additional exemplars. This paper investigates this discrepancy, showing that people do indeed perform qualitatively differently in categorization and generalization tasks even when all superficial elements of the task are kept constant. Furthermore, the effect of category frequency on generalization is moderated by assumptions about how the items are sampled. We show that neither model naturally accounts for the pattern of behavior across both categorization and generalization tasks, and discuss theoretical extensions of these frameworks to account for the importance of category frequency and sampling assumptions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)80-102
Number of pages23
JournalCognitive Psychology
Volume111
Early online date1 Apr 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2019

Fingerprint

Sampling

Keywords

  • Categorization
  • Cognitive modeling
  • Generalization
  • Inference
  • Sampling assumptions

Cite this

@article{66d471a5480c4737945e8d9beaaa3068,
title = "Sample size, number of categories and sampling assumptions: Exploring some differences between categorization and generalization",
abstract = "Categorization and generalization are fundamentally related inference problems. Yet leading computational models of categorization (as exemplified by, e.g., Nosofsky, 1986) and generalization (as exemplified by, e.g., Tenenbaum and Griffiths, 2001) make qualitatively different predictions about how inference should change as a function of the number of items. Assuming all else is equal, categorization models predict that increasing the number of items in a category increases the chance of assigning a new item to that category; generalization models predict a decrease, or category tightening with additional exemplars. This paper investigates this discrepancy, showing that people do indeed perform qualitatively differently in categorization and generalization tasks even when all superficial elements of the task are kept constant. Furthermore, the effect of category frequency on generalization is moderated by assumptions about how the items are sampled. We show that neither model naturally accounts for the pattern of behavior across both categorization and generalization tasks, and discuss theoretical extensions of these frameworks to account for the importance of category frequency and sampling assumptions.",
keywords = "Categorization, Cognitive modeling, Generalization, Inference, Sampling assumptions",
author = "Hendrickson, {Andrew T} and Amy Perfors and Navarro, {Danielle J} and Keith Ransom",
note = "Copyright {\circledC} 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.cogpsych.2019.03.001",
language = "English",
volume = "111",
pages = "80--102",
journal = "Cognitive Psychology",
issn = "0010-0285",
publisher = "ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE",

}

Sample size, number of categories and sampling assumptions : Exploring some differences between categorization and generalization. / Hendrickson, Andrew T; Perfors, Amy; Navarro, Danielle J; Ransom, Keith.

In: Cognitive Psychology, Vol. 111, 01.06.2019, p. 80-102.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sample size, number of categories and sampling assumptions

T2 - Exploring some differences between categorization and generalization

AU - Hendrickson, Andrew T

AU - Perfors, Amy

AU - Navarro, Danielle J

AU - Ransom, Keith

N1 - Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

PY - 2019/6/1

Y1 - 2019/6/1

N2 - Categorization and generalization are fundamentally related inference problems. Yet leading computational models of categorization (as exemplified by, e.g., Nosofsky, 1986) and generalization (as exemplified by, e.g., Tenenbaum and Griffiths, 2001) make qualitatively different predictions about how inference should change as a function of the number of items. Assuming all else is equal, categorization models predict that increasing the number of items in a category increases the chance of assigning a new item to that category; generalization models predict a decrease, or category tightening with additional exemplars. This paper investigates this discrepancy, showing that people do indeed perform qualitatively differently in categorization and generalization tasks even when all superficial elements of the task are kept constant. Furthermore, the effect of category frequency on generalization is moderated by assumptions about how the items are sampled. We show that neither model naturally accounts for the pattern of behavior across both categorization and generalization tasks, and discuss theoretical extensions of these frameworks to account for the importance of category frequency and sampling assumptions.

AB - Categorization and generalization are fundamentally related inference problems. Yet leading computational models of categorization (as exemplified by, e.g., Nosofsky, 1986) and generalization (as exemplified by, e.g., Tenenbaum and Griffiths, 2001) make qualitatively different predictions about how inference should change as a function of the number of items. Assuming all else is equal, categorization models predict that increasing the number of items in a category increases the chance of assigning a new item to that category; generalization models predict a decrease, or category tightening with additional exemplars. This paper investigates this discrepancy, showing that people do indeed perform qualitatively differently in categorization and generalization tasks even when all superficial elements of the task are kept constant. Furthermore, the effect of category frequency on generalization is moderated by assumptions about how the items are sampled. We show that neither model naturally accounts for the pattern of behavior across both categorization and generalization tasks, and discuss theoretical extensions of these frameworks to account for the importance of category frequency and sampling assumptions.

KW - Categorization

KW - Cognitive modeling

KW - Generalization

KW - Inference

KW - Sampling assumptions

U2 - 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2019.03.001

DO - 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2019.03.001

M3 - Article

C2 - 30947074

VL - 111

SP - 80

EP - 102

JO - Cognitive Psychology

JF - Cognitive Psychology

SN - 0010-0285

ER -