Science, Values and Loves

Theologies as Expressive Constructions

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

74 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Invited to write “a manifesto for [my] own theological position”, I begin with science and human rights as excellent examples of universalist aspirations of modernity. Modern individualism is important too, as particular existential loves shape each life. Science, morality, and personal loves are interwoven in theologies, as creative constructions. The sciences are important, as we need not only individual authenticity but also accountability. My position presented here is science-inspired naturalistic theism. It is not “religious naturalism”, given the categorical difference between facts and values. It is not “natural theology”, as inductive approaches do not reach that far. It comes closer to a “theology of nature”, but it does not assume the epistemic claims involved. I consider theologies to be important expressive constructions.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)249-259
Number of pages11
JournalTheology and Science
Volume15
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 19 Jun 2017

Fingerprint

Expressive
Accountability
Categorical
Religious Naturalism
Human Rights
Theology of Nature
Natural Theology
Universalist
Individualism
Morality
Theism
Authenticity
Manifesto
Modernity
Aspiration

Keywords

  • agnost
  • expressive construction
  • Harry Frankfurt
  • Clifford Geertz
  • loves
  • modernity
  • science
  • theology
  • values
  • Susan Wolf

Cite this

@article{85ac54c187e74c0e843d47e237321252,
title = "Science, Values and Loves: Theologies as Expressive Constructions",
abstract = "Invited to write “a manifesto for [my] own theological position”, I begin with science and human rights as excellent examples of universalist aspirations of modernity. Modern individualism is important too, as particular existential loves shape each life. Science, morality, and personal loves are interwoven in theologies, as creative constructions. The sciences are important, as we need not only individual authenticity but also accountability. My position presented here is science-inspired naturalistic theism. It is not “religious naturalism”, given the categorical difference between facts and values. It is not “natural theology”, as inductive approaches do not reach that far. It comes closer to a “theology of nature”, but it does not assume the epistemic claims involved. I consider theologies to be important expressive constructions.",
keywords = "agnost, expressive construction, Harry Frankfurt, Clifford Geertz, loves, modernity, science, theology, values, Susan Wolf",
author = "W.B. Drees",
year = "2017",
month = "6",
day = "19",
doi = "10.1080/14746700.2017.1335071",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "249--259",
journal = "Theology and Science",
issn = "1474-6700",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

Science, Values and Loves : Theologies as Expressive Constructions. / Drees, W.B.

In: Theology and Science, Vol. 15, No. 3, 19.06.2017, p. 249-259.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Science, Values and Loves

T2 - Theologies as Expressive Constructions

AU - Drees, W.B.

PY - 2017/6/19

Y1 - 2017/6/19

N2 - Invited to write “a manifesto for [my] own theological position”, I begin with science and human rights as excellent examples of universalist aspirations of modernity. Modern individualism is important too, as particular existential loves shape each life. Science, morality, and personal loves are interwoven in theologies, as creative constructions. The sciences are important, as we need not only individual authenticity but also accountability. My position presented here is science-inspired naturalistic theism. It is not “religious naturalism”, given the categorical difference between facts and values. It is not “natural theology”, as inductive approaches do not reach that far. It comes closer to a “theology of nature”, but it does not assume the epistemic claims involved. I consider theologies to be important expressive constructions.

AB - Invited to write “a manifesto for [my] own theological position”, I begin with science and human rights as excellent examples of universalist aspirations of modernity. Modern individualism is important too, as particular existential loves shape each life. Science, morality, and personal loves are interwoven in theologies, as creative constructions. The sciences are important, as we need not only individual authenticity but also accountability. My position presented here is science-inspired naturalistic theism. It is not “religious naturalism”, given the categorical difference between facts and values. It is not “natural theology”, as inductive approaches do not reach that far. It comes closer to a “theology of nature”, but it does not assume the epistemic claims involved. I consider theologies to be important expressive constructions.

KW - agnost

KW - expressive construction

KW - Harry Frankfurt

KW - Clifford Geertz

KW - loves

KW - modernity

KW - science

KW - theology

KW - values

KW - Susan Wolf

U2 - 10.1080/14746700.2017.1335071

DO - 10.1080/14746700.2017.1335071

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 249

EP - 259

JO - Theology and Science

JF - Theology and Science

SN - 1474-6700

IS - 3

ER -