Screening poststroke fatigue: Feasibility and validation of an instrument for the screening of poststroke fatigue throughout the rehabilitation process

N. Kruithof, Melanie Hubertina Maria Van Cleef, Sascha Maria Cornelia Rasquin, Thamar Johannes Henricus Bovend'Eerdt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Objective
Our objective is to investigate the feasibility and validity of a new instrument to screen for determinants of poststroke fatigue during the rehabilitation process.
Design and Setting
This prospective cohort study was conducted within the stroke department of a rehabilitation center.
Participants
The participants in the study were postacute adult stroke patients. The Detection List Fatigue (DLF) was administered 2 weeks after the start of the rehabilitation program and again 6 weeks later.
Main Outcome Measures
To determine the construct validity, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, the Checklist Individual Strength subscale fatigue, and the Fatigue Severity Scale—7-item version were administered. A fatigue rating scale was used to measure the patients' fatigue experience. Frequency analyses of the number of patients reporting poststroke fatigue determinants according to the DLF were performed.
Results
One hundred seven patients (mean age 60 years) without severe communication difficulties were included in the study. The DLF was easy to understand and quick to administer. The DLF showed good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha: .79 and .87), high convergent validity (rs = .85 and rs = .79), and good divergent validity (rs = .31 and rs = .45). The majority of the patients (88.4%-90.2%) experienced at least 2 poststroke fatigue (PSF) determinants, of which “sleeping problem” was most frequently reported.
Conclusions
The DLF is a feasible and valid instrument for the screening of PSF determinants throughout the rehabilitation process in stroke patients. Future studies should investigate whether the use of the list in determining a treatment plan prevents the development of PSF.
Key Words
Stroke, fatigue, validity, signs and symptoms, rehabilitation
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)188-196
JournalJournal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases
Volume25
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2016

Keywords

  • Stroke
  • fatigue
  • validity
  • signs and symptoms
  • rehabilitation

Cite this

Kruithof, N. ; Van Cleef, Melanie Hubertina Maria ; Rasquin, Sascha Maria Cornelia ; Bovend'Eerdt, Thamar Johannes Henricus. / Screening poststroke fatigue : Feasibility and validation of an instrument for the screening of poststroke fatigue throughout the rehabilitation process. In: Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases. 2016 ; Vol. 25, No. 1. pp. 188-196.
@article{61cd3922657e420c9bdf850109188964,
title = "Screening poststroke fatigue: Feasibility and validation of an instrument for the screening of poststroke fatigue throughout the rehabilitation process",
abstract = "ObjectiveOur objective is to investigate the feasibility and validity of a new instrument to screen for determinants of poststroke fatigue during the rehabilitation process.Design and SettingThis prospective cohort study was conducted within the stroke department of a rehabilitation center.ParticipantsThe participants in the study were postacute adult stroke patients. The Detection List Fatigue (DLF) was administered 2 weeks after the start of the rehabilitation program and again 6 weeks later.Main Outcome MeasuresTo determine the construct validity, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, the Checklist Individual Strength subscale fatigue, and the Fatigue Severity Scale—7-item version were administered. A fatigue rating scale was used to measure the patients' fatigue experience. Frequency analyses of the number of patients reporting poststroke fatigue determinants according to the DLF were performed.ResultsOne hundred seven patients (mean age 60 years) without severe communication difficulties were included in the study. The DLF was easy to understand and quick to administer. The DLF showed good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha: .79 and .87), high convergent validity (rs = .85 and rs = .79), and good divergent validity (rs = .31 and rs = .45). The majority of the patients (88.4{\%}-90.2{\%}) experienced at least 2 poststroke fatigue (PSF) determinants, of which “sleeping problem” was most frequently reported.ConclusionsThe DLF is a feasible and valid instrument for the screening of PSF determinants throughout the rehabilitation process in stroke patients. Future studies should investigate whether the use of the list in determining a treatment plan prevents the development of PSF.Key WordsStroke, fatigue, validity, signs and symptoms, rehabilitation",
keywords = "Stroke, fatigue, validity, signs and symptoms, rehabilitation",
author = "N. Kruithof and {Van Cleef}, {Melanie Hubertina Maria} and Rasquin, {Sascha Maria Cornelia} and Bovend'Eerdt, {Thamar Johannes Henricus}",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2015.09.015",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "188--196",
journal = "Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases",
issn = "1052-3057",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "1",

}

Screening poststroke fatigue : Feasibility and validation of an instrument for the screening of poststroke fatigue throughout the rehabilitation process. / Kruithof, N.; Van Cleef, Melanie Hubertina Maria; Rasquin, Sascha Maria Cornelia; Bovend'Eerdt, Thamar Johannes Henricus.

In: Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases, Vol. 25, No. 1, 01.2016, p. 188-196.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Screening poststroke fatigue

T2 - Feasibility and validation of an instrument for the screening of poststroke fatigue throughout the rehabilitation process

AU - Kruithof, N.

AU - Van Cleef, Melanie Hubertina Maria

AU - Rasquin, Sascha Maria Cornelia

AU - Bovend'Eerdt, Thamar Johannes Henricus

PY - 2016/1

Y1 - 2016/1

N2 - ObjectiveOur objective is to investigate the feasibility and validity of a new instrument to screen for determinants of poststroke fatigue during the rehabilitation process.Design and SettingThis prospective cohort study was conducted within the stroke department of a rehabilitation center.ParticipantsThe participants in the study were postacute adult stroke patients. The Detection List Fatigue (DLF) was administered 2 weeks after the start of the rehabilitation program and again 6 weeks later.Main Outcome MeasuresTo determine the construct validity, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, the Checklist Individual Strength subscale fatigue, and the Fatigue Severity Scale—7-item version were administered. A fatigue rating scale was used to measure the patients' fatigue experience. Frequency analyses of the number of patients reporting poststroke fatigue determinants according to the DLF were performed.ResultsOne hundred seven patients (mean age 60 years) without severe communication difficulties were included in the study. The DLF was easy to understand and quick to administer. The DLF showed good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha: .79 and .87), high convergent validity (rs = .85 and rs = .79), and good divergent validity (rs = .31 and rs = .45). The majority of the patients (88.4%-90.2%) experienced at least 2 poststroke fatigue (PSF) determinants, of which “sleeping problem” was most frequently reported.ConclusionsThe DLF is a feasible and valid instrument for the screening of PSF determinants throughout the rehabilitation process in stroke patients. Future studies should investigate whether the use of the list in determining a treatment plan prevents the development of PSF.Key WordsStroke, fatigue, validity, signs and symptoms, rehabilitation

AB - ObjectiveOur objective is to investigate the feasibility and validity of a new instrument to screen for determinants of poststroke fatigue during the rehabilitation process.Design and SettingThis prospective cohort study was conducted within the stroke department of a rehabilitation center.ParticipantsThe participants in the study were postacute adult stroke patients. The Detection List Fatigue (DLF) was administered 2 weeks after the start of the rehabilitation program and again 6 weeks later.Main Outcome MeasuresTo determine the construct validity, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, the Checklist Individual Strength subscale fatigue, and the Fatigue Severity Scale—7-item version were administered. A fatigue rating scale was used to measure the patients' fatigue experience. Frequency analyses of the number of patients reporting poststroke fatigue determinants according to the DLF were performed.ResultsOne hundred seven patients (mean age 60 years) without severe communication difficulties were included in the study. The DLF was easy to understand and quick to administer. The DLF showed good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha: .79 and .87), high convergent validity (rs = .85 and rs = .79), and good divergent validity (rs = .31 and rs = .45). The majority of the patients (88.4%-90.2%) experienced at least 2 poststroke fatigue (PSF) determinants, of which “sleeping problem” was most frequently reported.ConclusionsThe DLF is a feasible and valid instrument for the screening of PSF determinants throughout the rehabilitation process in stroke patients. Future studies should investigate whether the use of the list in determining a treatment plan prevents the development of PSF.Key WordsStroke, fatigue, validity, signs and symptoms, rehabilitation

KW - Stroke

KW - fatigue

KW - validity

KW - signs and symptoms

KW - rehabilitation

U2 - 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2015.09.015

DO - 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2015.09.015

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 188

EP - 196

JO - Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases

JF - Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases

SN - 1052-3057

IS - 1

ER -