Scripting the DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders assessment procedure: A clinically feasible multi-informant multi-method approach

Laura C Weekers, Joost Hutsebaut, Bo Bach, Jan H Kamphuis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Published case studies on the DSM-5 (section III) Alternative Model for Personality Disorders (AMPD) generally utilized unstandardized assessment procedures or mono-method approaches. We present a case from clinical practice to illustrate a standardized, clinically feasible procedure for assessing personality pathology according to the full AMPD model, using a multi-method approach. We aim to present a procedure that can guide and inspire clinicians that are going to work with dimensional models as presented in DSM-5 and ICD-11. Specifically, we show how questionnaire and interview data from multiple sources (i.e. patient and family) can be combined. The clinical case also illustrates how Criterion A (i.e. functioning) and B (i.e. traits) are interrelated, suggesting that the joint assessment of both Criterion A and B is necessary for a comprehensive and clinically relevant case formulation. It also highlights how multi-method information can enhance diagnostic formulations. Finally, we show how the AMPD model can serve treatment planning and provide suggestions for how patient feedback might be delivered. © 2020 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)304-318
Number of pages15
JournalPersonality and Mental Health
Volume14
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Adult
  • Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
  • Humans
  • Interview, Psychological
  • Male
  • Personality Assessment/standards
  • Personality Disorders/diagnosis
  • Personality Inventory
  • Psychiatric Status Rating Scales

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Scripting the DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders assessment procedure: A clinically feasible multi-informant multi-method approach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this