Abstract
Published case studies on the DSM-5 (section III) Alternative Model for Personality Disorders (AMPD) generally utilized unstandardized assessment procedures or mono-method approaches. We present a case from clinical practice to illustrate a standardized, clinically feasible procedure for assessing personality pathology according to the full AMPD model, using a multi-method approach. We aim to present a procedure that can guide and inspire clinicians that are going to work with dimensional models as presented in DSM-5 and ICD-11. Specifically, we show how questionnaire and interview data from multiple sources (i.e. patient and family) can be combined. The clinical case also illustrates how Criterion A (i.e. functioning) and B (i.e. traits) are interrelated, suggesting that the joint assessment of both Criterion A and B is necessary for a comprehensive and clinically relevant case formulation. It also highlights how multi-method information can enhance diagnostic formulations. Finally, we show how the AMPD model can serve treatment planning and provide suggestions for how patient feedback might be delivered. © 2020 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 304-318 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | Personality and Mental Health |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2020 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Adult
- Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
- Humans
- Interview, Psychological
- Male
- Personality Assessment/standards
- Personality Disorders/diagnosis
- Personality Inventory
- Psychiatric Status Rating Scales
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Scripting the DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders assessment procedure: A clinically feasible multi-informant multi-method approach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver