Search engine advertisements

The impact of advertising statements on click-through and conversion rates

A.J. Haans, N. Raassens, R.M.W.M. van Hout

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Search engine advertising has emerged as the predominant form of advertising on the Internet. Despite its increasing importance academic research on this topic is scarce. Several authors have called for more research on how the content of the ad influences its evaluation. This exploratory study builds on this call for more research and examines the impact of evidence type on click-through and conversion rates in a search engine advertising setting. We find that click-through rates are higher for advertisements involving expert evidence and statistical evidence than for advertisements involving causal evidence. On the contrary, we find that causal evidence results in higher conversion rates than other types of evidence. These findings help marketers to fine-tune their advertising in search engines. In particular, if their aim is to attract people to the website, expert evidence and statistical evidence should be used, while causal evidence works best if the main objective is to generate conversions.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)151-163
JournalMarketing Letters
Volume24
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Click-through rate
Search engine
Conversion rate
Exploratory study
World Wide Web
Web sites
Evaluation
Marketers
Academic research

Cite this

@article{8d02d194141444ce893f45331306247a,
title = "Search engine advertisements: The impact of advertising statements on click-through and conversion rates",
abstract = "Search engine advertising has emerged as the predominant form of advertising on the Internet. Despite its increasing importance academic research on this topic is scarce. Several authors have called for more research on how the content of the ad influences its evaluation. This exploratory study builds on this call for more research and examines the impact of evidence type on click-through and conversion rates in a search engine advertising setting. We find that click-through rates are higher for advertisements involving expert evidence and statistical evidence than for advertisements involving causal evidence. On the contrary, we find that causal evidence results in higher conversion rates than other types of evidence. These findings help marketers to fine-tune their advertising in search engines. In particular, if their aim is to attract people to the website, expert evidence and statistical evidence should be used, while causal evidence works best if the main objective is to generate conversions.",
author = "A.J. Haans and N. Raassens and {van Hout}, R.M.W.M.",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1007{\%}2fs11002-013-9226-5#",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "151--163",
journal = "Marketing Letters",
issn = "0923-0645",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "2",

}

Search engine advertisements : The impact of advertising statements on click-through and conversion rates. / Haans, A.J.; Raassens, N.; van Hout, R.M.W.M.

In: Marketing Letters, Vol. 24, No. 2, 2013, p. 151-163.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Search engine advertisements

T2 - The impact of advertising statements on click-through and conversion rates

AU - Haans, A.J.

AU - Raassens, N.

AU - van Hout, R.M.W.M.

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Search engine advertising has emerged as the predominant form of advertising on the Internet. Despite its increasing importance academic research on this topic is scarce. Several authors have called for more research on how the content of the ad influences its evaluation. This exploratory study builds on this call for more research and examines the impact of evidence type on click-through and conversion rates in a search engine advertising setting. We find that click-through rates are higher for advertisements involving expert evidence and statistical evidence than for advertisements involving causal evidence. On the contrary, we find that causal evidence results in higher conversion rates than other types of evidence. These findings help marketers to fine-tune their advertising in search engines. In particular, if their aim is to attract people to the website, expert evidence and statistical evidence should be used, while causal evidence works best if the main objective is to generate conversions.

AB - Search engine advertising has emerged as the predominant form of advertising on the Internet. Despite its increasing importance academic research on this topic is scarce. Several authors have called for more research on how the content of the ad influences its evaluation. This exploratory study builds on this call for more research and examines the impact of evidence type on click-through and conversion rates in a search engine advertising setting. We find that click-through rates are higher for advertisements involving expert evidence and statistical evidence than for advertisements involving causal evidence. On the contrary, we find that causal evidence results in higher conversion rates than other types of evidence. These findings help marketers to fine-tune their advertising in search engines. In particular, if their aim is to attract people to the website, expert evidence and statistical evidence should be used, while causal evidence works best if the main objective is to generate conversions.

U2 - 10.1007%2fs11002-013-9226-5#

DO - 10.1007%2fs11002-013-9226-5#

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 151

EP - 163

JO - Marketing Letters

JF - Marketing Letters

SN - 0923-0645

IS - 2

ER -