Sensory exploitation: underestimated in the evolution of art as once in sexual selection?

J. Verpooten, M. Nelissen

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterScientificpeer-review

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationPhilosophy of behavioral biology
EditorsK.S. Plaisance, T.A.C. Reydon
PublisherBoston Studies in the Philosophy of Science
Pages189-216
Volume282
Edition4
ISBN (Electronic)978-94-007-1951-4
ISBN (Print)978-94-007-1950-7, 978-94-007-3732-7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012
Externally publishedYes

Cite this

Verpooten, J., & Nelissen, M. (2012). Sensory exploitation: underestimated in the evolution of art as once in sexual selection? In K. S. Plaisance, & T. A. C. Reydon (Eds.), Philosophy of behavioral biology (4 ed., Vol. 282, pp. 189-216). Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1951-4
Verpooten, J. ; Nelissen, M. / Sensory exploitation: underestimated in the evolution of art as once in sexual selection?. Philosophy of behavioral biology. editor / K.S. Plaisance ; T.A.C. Reydon. Vol. 282 4. ed. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 2012. pp. 189-216
@inbook{330fca5be4264c7a920378a91ea30c80,
title = "Sensory exploitation: underestimated in the evolution of art as once in sexual selection?",
author = "J. Verpooten and M. Nelissen",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1007/978-94-007-1951-4",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-94-007-1950-7",
volume = "282",
pages = "189--216",
editor = "K.S. Plaisance and T.A.C. Reydon",
booktitle = "Philosophy of behavioral biology",
publisher = "Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science",
edition = "4",

}

Verpooten, J & Nelissen, M 2012, Sensory exploitation: underestimated in the evolution of art as once in sexual selection? in KS Plaisance & TAC Reydon (eds), Philosophy of behavioral biology. 4 edn, vol. 282, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, pp. 189-216. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1951-4

Sensory exploitation: underestimated in the evolution of art as once in sexual selection? / Verpooten, J.; Nelissen, M.

Philosophy of behavioral biology. ed. / K.S. Plaisance; T.A.C. Reydon. Vol. 282 4. ed. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 2012. p. 189-216.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterScientificpeer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - Sensory exploitation: underestimated in the evolution of art as once in sexual selection?

AU - Verpooten, J.

AU - Nelissen, M.

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

U2 - 10.1007/978-94-007-1951-4

DO - 10.1007/978-94-007-1951-4

M3 - Chapter

SN - 978-94-007-1950-7

SN - 978-94-007-3732-7

VL - 282

SP - 189

EP - 216

BT - Philosophy of behavioral biology

A2 - Plaisance, K.S.

A2 - Reydon, T.A.C.

PB - Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science

ER -

Verpooten J, Nelissen M. Sensory exploitation: underestimated in the evolution of art as once in sexual selection? In Plaisance KS, Reydon TAC, editors, Philosophy of behavioral biology. 4 ed. Vol. 282. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science. 2012. p. 189-216 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1951-4