Setting a Bad Example: Peer, Parental, and Celebrity Norms Predict Celebrity Bashing

Gaelle Ouvrein*, Sara Pabian, Juan Manuel Machimbarrena, Sara Erreygers, Charlotte J. S. De Backer, Heidi Vandebosch

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

The present study investigated the effect of descriptive and injunctive norms of peers, parents, and favorite celebrities on adolescents' negative online behavior toward celebrities. The sample consisted of 1,255 adolescents ((X) over bar (age) = 14.17, SD = 0.47). Adolescents indicated what their peers, parents, and favorite celebrities think of celebrity bashing (injunctive norms) and whether they engage in it (descriptive norms). The adolescents also indicated how often they had participated in negative online behavior toward celebrities and peers. The results revealed that compared with injunctive norms, descriptive norms are better predictors of adolescents' negative online behavior toward celebrities. Focusing on the different role models, the impact of peers was the strongest for both mild and severe forms of celebrity aggression. Moreover, the results showed that adolescents who engage in negative online behavior directed at celebrities are likely to do the same regarding peers.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)937-961
Number of pages25
JournalThe Journal of Early Adolescence
Volume39
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2019
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • celebrity bashing
  • cyberbullying
  • descriptive and injunctive norms
  • adolescents
  • role models
  • SELF-DETERMINATION THEORY
  • SOCIAL-LEARNING THEORY
  • PLANNED BEHAVIOR
  • SUBJECTIVE NORMS
  • MEDIA
  • PERPETRATION
  • ASSOCIATIONS
  • ATTACHMENT
  • DRINKING
  • IMPACT

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Setting a Bad Example: Peer, Parental, and Celebrity Norms Predict Celebrity Bashing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this