Sex- and gender stratified risks of psychological factors for incident ischemic heart disease: Systematic review and meta analysis

V.R. Smaardijk, P. Lodder, W.J. Kop, B. van Gennep, A.H.E.M. Maas, P.M.C. Mommersteeg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Background
Psychological factors are associated with an increased risk of developing ischemic heart disease (IHD). Women more often report psychological factors, and sex and gender differences are present in IHD. In this meta‐analysis we examine the risks of psychological factors for IHD incidence in women and men. We hypothesize that a broad range of psychological factors are related to a higher risk for incident IHD, with a higher risk for women.

Methods and Results
PubMed, EMBASE, and PsycINFO were searched for studies assessing the risk between psychological factors and incident IHD. Psychological factors included depression, anxiety or panic disorder, social support, hostility, anger, personality (type D), type A behavior pattern, posttraumatic stress disorder, and psychological distress. In the primary analyses, 62 studies (77 separate reports) that included 2 145 679 women and 3 119 879 men and reported confounder‐adjusted hazard ratios or relative risks were included. Pooled effect confounder‐adjusted estimates from random‐effects models showed that psychological factors (all combined) were associated with incident IHD in women (hazard ratio: 1.22; 95% CI, 1.14–1.30) and men (hazard ratio: 1.25; 95% CI, 1.19–1.31). No sex and gender differences were found for these pooled effect estimates (P=0.547).

Conclusions
Psychological factors are associated with incident IHD in both women and men, but no significant differences were observed between women and men. IHD is predominantly being studied as obstructive coronary artery disease, which is more prevalent in men. Data are needed on psychological predictors and other manifestations of IHD such as coronary microvascular disease, which is more common in women.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)e010859
Number of pages49
JournalJournal of the American Heart Association
Volume8
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Fingerprint

Hostility
Panic Disorder
Depression
Incidence

Cite this

@article{55b5ce54247b4704abda101e14669558,
title = "Sex- and gender stratified risks of psychological factors for incident ischemic heart disease: Systematic review and meta analysis",
abstract = "BackgroundPsychological factors are associated with an increased risk of developing ischemic heart disease (IHD). Women more often report psychological factors, and sex and gender differences are present in IHD. In this meta‐analysis we examine the risks of psychological factors for IHD incidence in women and men. We hypothesize that a broad range of psychological factors are related to a higher risk for incident IHD, with a higher risk for women.Methods and ResultsPubMed, EMBASE, and PsycINFO were searched for studies assessing the risk between psychological factors and incident IHD. Psychological factors included depression, anxiety or panic disorder, social support, hostility, anger, personality (type D), type A behavior pattern, posttraumatic stress disorder, and psychological distress. In the primary analyses, 62 studies (77 separate reports) that included 2 145 679 women and 3 119 879 men and reported confounder‐adjusted hazard ratios or relative risks were included. Pooled effect confounder‐adjusted estimates from random‐effects models showed that psychological factors (all combined) were associated with incident IHD in women (hazard ratio: 1.22; 95{\%} CI, 1.14–1.30) and men (hazard ratio: 1.25; 95{\%} CI, 1.19–1.31). No sex and gender differences were found for these pooled effect estimates (P=0.547).ConclusionsPsychological factors are associated with incident IHD in both women and men, but no significant differences were observed between women and men. IHD is predominantly being studied as obstructive coronary artery disease, which is more prevalent in men. Data are needed on psychological predictors and other manifestations of IHD such as coronary microvascular disease, which is more common in women.",
author = "V.R. Smaardijk and P. Lodder and W.J. Kop and {van Gennep}, B. and A.H.E.M. Maas and P.M.C. Mommersteeg",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1161/JAHA.118.010859",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "e010859",
journal = "Journal of the American Heart Association",
issn = "2047-9980",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "9",

}

Sex- and gender stratified risks of psychological factors for incident ischemic heart disease : Systematic review and meta analysis. / Smaardijk, V.R.; Lodder, P.; Kop, W.J.; van Gennep, B.; Maas, A.H.E.M.; Mommersteeg, P.M.C.

In: Journal of the American Heart Association, Vol. 8, No. 9, 2019, p. e010859.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sex- and gender stratified risks of psychological factors for incident ischemic heart disease

T2 - Systematic review and meta analysis

AU - Smaardijk, V.R.

AU - Lodder, P.

AU - Kop, W.J.

AU - van Gennep, B.

AU - Maas, A.H.E.M.

AU - Mommersteeg, P.M.C.

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - BackgroundPsychological factors are associated with an increased risk of developing ischemic heart disease (IHD). Women more often report psychological factors, and sex and gender differences are present in IHD. In this meta‐analysis we examine the risks of psychological factors for IHD incidence in women and men. We hypothesize that a broad range of psychological factors are related to a higher risk for incident IHD, with a higher risk for women.Methods and ResultsPubMed, EMBASE, and PsycINFO were searched for studies assessing the risk between psychological factors and incident IHD. Psychological factors included depression, anxiety or panic disorder, social support, hostility, anger, personality (type D), type A behavior pattern, posttraumatic stress disorder, and psychological distress. In the primary analyses, 62 studies (77 separate reports) that included 2 145 679 women and 3 119 879 men and reported confounder‐adjusted hazard ratios or relative risks were included. Pooled effect confounder‐adjusted estimates from random‐effects models showed that psychological factors (all combined) were associated with incident IHD in women (hazard ratio: 1.22; 95% CI, 1.14–1.30) and men (hazard ratio: 1.25; 95% CI, 1.19–1.31). No sex and gender differences were found for these pooled effect estimates (P=0.547).ConclusionsPsychological factors are associated with incident IHD in both women and men, but no significant differences were observed between women and men. IHD is predominantly being studied as obstructive coronary artery disease, which is more prevalent in men. Data are needed on psychological predictors and other manifestations of IHD such as coronary microvascular disease, which is more common in women.

AB - BackgroundPsychological factors are associated with an increased risk of developing ischemic heart disease (IHD). Women more often report psychological factors, and sex and gender differences are present in IHD. In this meta‐analysis we examine the risks of psychological factors for IHD incidence in women and men. We hypothesize that a broad range of psychological factors are related to a higher risk for incident IHD, with a higher risk for women.Methods and ResultsPubMed, EMBASE, and PsycINFO were searched for studies assessing the risk between psychological factors and incident IHD. Psychological factors included depression, anxiety or panic disorder, social support, hostility, anger, personality (type D), type A behavior pattern, posttraumatic stress disorder, and psychological distress. In the primary analyses, 62 studies (77 separate reports) that included 2 145 679 women and 3 119 879 men and reported confounder‐adjusted hazard ratios or relative risks were included. Pooled effect confounder‐adjusted estimates from random‐effects models showed that psychological factors (all combined) were associated with incident IHD in women (hazard ratio: 1.22; 95% CI, 1.14–1.30) and men (hazard ratio: 1.25; 95% CI, 1.19–1.31). No sex and gender differences were found for these pooled effect estimates (P=0.547).ConclusionsPsychological factors are associated with incident IHD in both women and men, but no significant differences were observed between women and men. IHD is predominantly being studied as obstructive coronary artery disease, which is more prevalent in men. Data are needed on psychological predictors and other manifestations of IHD such as coronary microvascular disease, which is more common in women.

U2 - 10.1161/JAHA.118.010859

DO - 10.1161/JAHA.118.010859

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - e010859

JO - Journal of the American Heart Association

JF - Journal of the American Heart Association

SN - 2047-9980

IS - 9

ER -