Sex bias in classifying borderline and narcissistic personality disorder

W. Braamhorst, J. Lobbestael, Wilco Emons, A. Arntz, C.L.M. Witteman, M.H.J. Bekker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

This study investigated sex bias in the classification of borderline and narcissistic personality disorders. A sample of psychologists in training for a post-master degree (N = 180) read brief case histories (male or female version) and made DSM classification. To differentiate sex bias due to sex stereotyping or to base rate variation, we used different case histories, respectively: (1) non-ambiguous case histories with enough criteria of either borderline or narcissistic personality disorder to meet the threshold for classification, and (2) an ambiguous case with subthreshold features of both borderline and narcissistic personality disorder. Results showed significant differences due to sex of the patient in the ambiguous condition. Thus, when the diagnosis is not straightforward, as in the case of mixed subthreshold features, sex bias is present and is influenced by base-rate variation. These findings emphasize the need for caution in classifying personality disorders, especially borderline or narcissistic traits.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)804-808
JournalJournal of Nervous and Mental Disease
Volume203
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Cite this

Braamhorst, W. ; Lobbestael, J. ; Emons, Wilco ; Arntz, A. ; Witteman, C.L.M. ; Bekker, M.H.J. / Sex bias in classifying borderline and narcissistic personality disorder. In: Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease. 2015 ; Vol. 203, No. 10. pp. 804-808.
@article{79f1edd1c20243309d53f76571d24ce1,
title = "Sex bias in classifying borderline and narcissistic personality disorder",
abstract = "This study investigated sex bias in the classification of borderline and narcissistic personality disorders. A sample of psychologists in training for a post-master degree (N = 180) read brief case histories (male or female version) and made DSM classification. To differentiate sex bias due to sex stereotyping or to base rate variation, we used different case histories, respectively: (1) non-ambiguous case histories with enough criteria of either borderline or narcissistic personality disorder to meet the threshold for classification, and (2) an ambiguous case with subthreshold features of both borderline and narcissistic personality disorder. Results showed significant differences due to sex of the patient in the ambiguous condition. Thus, when the diagnosis is not straightforward, as in the case of mixed subthreshold features, sex bias is present and is influenced by base-rate variation. These findings emphasize the need for caution in classifying personality disorders, especially borderline or narcissistic traits.",
author = "W. Braamhorst and J. Lobbestael and Wilco Emons and A. Arntz and C.L.M. Witteman and M.H.J. Bekker",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1097/NMD.0000000000000371",
language = "English",
volume = "203",
pages = "804--808",
journal = "Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease",
issn = "0022-3018",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "10",

}

Sex bias in classifying borderline and narcissistic personality disorder. / Braamhorst, W.; Lobbestael, J.; Emons, Wilco; Arntz, A.; Witteman, C.L.M.; Bekker, M.H.J.

In: Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, Vol. 203, No. 10, 2015, p. 804-808.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sex bias in classifying borderline and narcissistic personality disorder

AU - Braamhorst, W.

AU - Lobbestael, J.

AU - Emons, Wilco

AU - Arntz, A.

AU - Witteman, C.L.M.

AU - Bekker, M.H.J.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - This study investigated sex bias in the classification of borderline and narcissistic personality disorders. A sample of psychologists in training for a post-master degree (N = 180) read brief case histories (male or female version) and made DSM classification. To differentiate sex bias due to sex stereotyping or to base rate variation, we used different case histories, respectively: (1) non-ambiguous case histories with enough criteria of either borderline or narcissistic personality disorder to meet the threshold for classification, and (2) an ambiguous case with subthreshold features of both borderline and narcissistic personality disorder. Results showed significant differences due to sex of the patient in the ambiguous condition. Thus, when the diagnosis is not straightforward, as in the case of mixed subthreshold features, sex bias is present and is influenced by base-rate variation. These findings emphasize the need for caution in classifying personality disorders, especially borderline or narcissistic traits.

AB - This study investigated sex bias in the classification of borderline and narcissistic personality disorders. A sample of psychologists in training for a post-master degree (N = 180) read brief case histories (male or female version) and made DSM classification. To differentiate sex bias due to sex stereotyping or to base rate variation, we used different case histories, respectively: (1) non-ambiguous case histories with enough criteria of either borderline or narcissistic personality disorder to meet the threshold for classification, and (2) an ambiguous case with subthreshold features of both borderline and narcissistic personality disorder. Results showed significant differences due to sex of the patient in the ambiguous condition. Thus, when the diagnosis is not straightforward, as in the case of mixed subthreshold features, sex bias is present and is influenced by base-rate variation. These findings emphasize the need for caution in classifying personality disorders, especially borderline or narcissistic traits.

U2 - 10.1097/NMD.0000000000000371

DO - 10.1097/NMD.0000000000000371

M3 - Article

VL - 203

SP - 804

EP - 808

JO - Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease

JF - Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease

SN - 0022-3018

IS - 10

ER -