Abstract
The article examines the consequences of the legal constitution of the business enterprise as a human rights-bearing entity for the ECHR’s conception of a democratic society. Drawing on case law of the European Court of Human Rights, it analyses the relationship between corporate free speech rights and democracy through the lens of individual and statal analogies to corporate personhood, as embedded in the liberal public/private divide. While individual analogies attribute human rights to business enterprises as (aggregates of) natural persons, statal analogies frame the relationship between business and human rights in terms of a rearticulation of state power and authority in society. It is argued that neither individual nor statal analogies provide a convincing justification for the human rights of business enterprises. Instead, both approaches result in a reinterpretation of political rights as market freedoms, thereby transforming the boundaries of liberal democracy.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Number of pages | 24 |
| Journal | Transnational Legal Theory |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 10 Jun 2025 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- corporate human rights
- business interprise
- freedom of expression
- democracy
- public-private divide
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Shields and swords: the human rights of business enterprises and the boundaries of democracy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver