Shortened versions of the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scale meet the standards

T. Smeets, J. Leppink, M. Jelicic, H. Merckelbach

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Purpose.
The Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scale (GSS; Gudjonsson, 1984, 1997) is a well‐established forensic tool for measuring interrogative suggestibility. However, one restriction of this tool is that it requires an extensive testing procedure. The present study examined whether shorter versions of the GSS yield similar results as the original GSS procedure.

Methods.
ne group (N=20) was given a shortened version of the GSS that consisted of an immediate recall test and the specific questions. GSS scores in this group were compared with those in a group (N=20) that had the standard procedure which includes a retention interval and immediate and delayed recall tests. A third group (N=20) was administered a shortened procedure in which the 20 GSS questions immediately followed the GSS story. In the fourth group (N=20), participants were given the retention interval, but no recall tests were administered.

Results.
ANOVA showed no differences in GSS scores amongst the four groups. Post hoc power analyses indicated that these non‐significant findings were not the result of a power problem and that larger sample sizes are expected to yield comparable results. Further analyses showed that neither the retention delay nor the recall tests affected suggestibility scores.

Conclusions.
These results suggest that shortened procedures for administering the GSS may be employed in situations where time is a key factor.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)149-155
JournalLegal and Criminological Psychology
Volume14
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Short-Term Memory

Cite this

Smeets, T. ; Leppink, J. ; Jelicic, M. ; Merckelbach, H. / Shortened versions of the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scale meet the standards. In: Legal and Criminological Psychology. 2009 ; Vol. 14, No. 1. pp. 149-155.
@article{711f35c0d5e047ab985a7dc9c76abf11,
title = "Shortened versions of the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scale meet the standards",
abstract = "Purpose. The Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scale (GSS; Gudjonsson, 1984, 1997) is a well‐established forensic tool for measuring interrogative suggestibility. However, one restriction of this tool is that it requires an extensive testing procedure. The present study examined whether shorter versions of the GSS yield similar results as the original GSS procedure.Methods. ne group (N=20) was given a shortened version of the GSS that consisted of an immediate recall test and the specific questions. GSS scores in this group were compared with those in a group (N=20) that had the standard procedure which includes a retention interval and immediate and delayed recall tests. A third group (N=20) was administered a shortened procedure in which the 20 GSS questions immediately followed the GSS story. In the fourth group (N=20), participants were given the retention interval, but no recall tests were administered.Results. ANOVA showed no differences in GSS scores amongst the four groups. Post hoc power analyses indicated that these non‐significant findings were not the result of a power problem and that larger sample sizes are expected to yield comparable results. Further analyses showed that neither the retention delay nor the recall tests affected suggestibility scores.Conclusions. These results suggest that shortened procedures for administering the GSS may be employed in situations where time is a key factor.",
author = "T. Smeets and J. Leppink and M. Jelicic and H. Merckelbach",
year = "2009",
doi = "/10.1348/135532507X190207",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "149--155",
journal = "Legal and Criminological Psychology",
issn = "1355-3259",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "1",

}

Shortened versions of the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scale meet the standards. / Smeets, T.; Leppink, J.; Jelicic, M.; Merckelbach, H.

In: Legal and Criminological Psychology, Vol. 14, No. 1, 2009, p. 149-155.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Shortened versions of the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scale meet the standards

AU - Smeets, T.

AU - Leppink, J.

AU - Jelicic, M.

AU - Merckelbach, H.

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Purpose. The Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scale (GSS; Gudjonsson, 1984, 1997) is a well‐established forensic tool for measuring interrogative suggestibility. However, one restriction of this tool is that it requires an extensive testing procedure. The present study examined whether shorter versions of the GSS yield similar results as the original GSS procedure.Methods. ne group (N=20) was given a shortened version of the GSS that consisted of an immediate recall test and the specific questions. GSS scores in this group were compared with those in a group (N=20) that had the standard procedure which includes a retention interval and immediate and delayed recall tests. A third group (N=20) was administered a shortened procedure in which the 20 GSS questions immediately followed the GSS story. In the fourth group (N=20), participants were given the retention interval, but no recall tests were administered.Results. ANOVA showed no differences in GSS scores amongst the four groups. Post hoc power analyses indicated that these non‐significant findings were not the result of a power problem and that larger sample sizes are expected to yield comparable results. Further analyses showed that neither the retention delay nor the recall tests affected suggestibility scores.Conclusions. These results suggest that shortened procedures for administering the GSS may be employed in situations where time is a key factor.

AB - Purpose. The Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scale (GSS; Gudjonsson, 1984, 1997) is a well‐established forensic tool for measuring interrogative suggestibility. However, one restriction of this tool is that it requires an extensive testing procedure. The present study examined whether shorter versions of the GSS yield similar results as the original GSS procedure.Methods. ne group (N=20) was given a shortened version of the GSS that consisted of an immediate recall test and the specific questions. GSS scores in this group were compared with those in a group (N=20) that had the standard procedure which includes a retention interval and immediate and delayed recall tests. A third group (N=20) was administered a shortened procedure in which the 20 GSS questions immediately followed the GSS story. In the fourth group (N=20), participants were given the retention interval, but no recall tests were administered.Results. ANOVA showed no differences in GSS scores amongst the four groups. Post hoc power analyses indicated that these non‐significant findings were not the result of a power problem and that larger sample sizes are expected to yield comparable results. Further analyses showed that neither the retention delay nor the recall tests affected suggestibility scores.Conclusions. These results suggest that shortened procedures for administering the GSS may be employed in situations where time is a key factor.

U2 - /10.1348/135532507X190207

DO - /10.1348/135532507X190207

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 149

EP - 155

JO - Legal and Criminological Psychology

JF - Legal and Criminological Psychology

SN - 1355-3259

IS - 1

ER -