Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Should competition between regulated public transport and autonomous ride-sharing providers be allowed? An outlook into a possible transport paradox

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Provision of public transport with autonomous vehicles may enable the implementation of more flexible services, characterised by a reduction of the vehicle's capacity (and increase in the number of vehicles) - leading to fewer stops, better frequencies, and more individualised services (origins and destinations). If public transport provision is centralised, increasing flexibility will lead to reductions in average travel times (although not to the optimal capacity), as the provider internalises congestion costs; however, if public transport is provided in competitive conditions, it may lead to situations in which the entire society ends up worse off, representing a clear transportation paradox.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)56-78
JournalJournal of Transport Economics and Policy
Volume56
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2022

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 11 - Sustainable Cities and Communities
    SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Should competition between regulated public transport and autonomous ride-sharing providers be allowed? An outlook into a possible transport paradox'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this