Should the Same Side of the Market Always Move First in a Transaction? An Experimental Study

E.C.M. van der Heijden, J.H.M. Nelissen, H.A.A. Verbon

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paperOther research output

217 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper investigates whether transactions where the buyer (or the seller) always moves first, and the seller (or the buyer) always moves second in the exchange gives higher payoffs than an exchange in which it is randomly determined who moves first.We examine the effect of two treatment variables: Partners versus Strangers and fixed versus changing positions.We do not find much economic justification for establishing fixed roles in exchange relationships.Both with fixed and with changing positions, second movers take advantage of their position by exploiting the first mover by "not delivering" the demanded good.In the fixed positions treatments, exploitation occurs significantly less while reciprocal exchanges happen more often.In spite of this, it turns out that with fixed positions payoffs are very unevenly distributed.Unequal payoff distributions occur both under Partners and Strangers, but they appear to be more extreme among Strangers.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationTilburg
PublisherMicroeconomics
Number of pages29
Volume2000-103
Publication statusPublished - 2000

Publication series

NameCentER Discussion Paper
Volume2000-103

Fingerprint

Stranger
Experimental study
Seller
Buyers
Exploitation
Economics
Exchange relationships
Justification

Keywords

  • microeconomics

Cite this

van der Heijden, E. C. M., Nelissen, J. H. M., & Verbon, H. A. A. (2000). Should the Same Side of the Market Always Move First in a Transaction? An Experimental Study. (CentER Discussion Paper; Vol. 2000-103). Tilburg: Microeconomics.
van der Heijden, E.C.M. ; Nelissen, J.H.M. ; Verbon, H.A.A. / Should the Same Side of the Market Always Move First in a Transaction? An Experimental Study. Tilburg : Microeconomics, 2000. (CentER Discussion Paper).
@techreport{bbc2880799734a248aa532b634815dbf,
title = "Should the Same Side of the Market Always Move First in a Transaction? An Experimental Study",
abstract = "This paper investigates whether transactions where the buyer (or the seller) always moves first, and the seller (or the buyer) always moves second in the exchange gives higher payoffs than an exchange in which it is randomly determined who moves first.We examine the effect of two treatment variables: Partners versus Strangers and fixed versus changing positions.We do not find much economic justification for establishing fixed roles in exchange relationships.Both with fixed and with changing positions, second movers take advantage of their position by exploiting the first mover by {"}not delivering{"} the demanded good.In the fixed positions treatments, exploitation occurs significantly less while reciprocal exchanges happen more often.In spite of this, it turns out that with fixed positions payoffs are very unevenly distributed.Unequal payoff distributions occur both under Partners and Strangers, but they appear to be more extreme among Strangers.",
keywords = "microeconomics",
author = "{van der Heijden}, E.C.M. and J.H.M. Nelissen and H.A.A. Verbon",
note = "Pagination: 29",
year = "2000",
language = "English",
volume = "2000-103",
series = "CentER Discussion Paper",
publisher = "Microeconomics",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "Microeconomics",

}

van der Heijden, ECM, Nelissen, JHM & Verbon, HAA 2000 'Should the Same Side of the Market Always Move First in a Transaction? An Experimental Study' CentER Discussion Paper, vol. 2000-103, Microeconomics, Tilburg.

Should the Same Side of the Market Always Move First in a Transaction? An Experimental Study. / van der Heijden, E.C.M.; Nelissen, J.H.M.; Verbon, H.A.A.

Tilburg : Microeconomics, 2000. (CentER Discussion Paper; Vol. 2000-103).

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paperOther research output

TY - UNPB

T1 - Should the Same Side of the Market Always Move First in a Transaction? An Experimental Study

AU - van der Heijden, E.C.M.

AU - Nelissen, J.H.M.

AU - Verbon, H.A.A.

N1 - Pagination: 29

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - This paper investigates whether transactions where the buyer (or the seller) always moves first, and the seller (or the buyer) always moves second in the exchange gives higher payoffs than an exchange in which it is randomly determined who moves first.We examine the effect of two treatment variables: Partners versus Strangers and fixed versus changing positions.We do not find much economic justification for establishing fixed roles in exchange relationships.Both with fixed and with changing positions, second movers take advantage of their position by exploiting the first mover by "not delivering" the demanded good.In the fixed positions treatments, exploitation occurs significantly less while reciprocal exchanges happen more often.In spite of this, it turns out that with fixed positions payoffs are very unevenly distributed.Unequal payoff distributions occur both under Partners and Strangers, but they appear to be more extreme among Strangers.

AB - This paper investigates whether transactions where the buyer (or the seller) always moves first, and the seller (or the buyer) always moves second in the exchange gives higher payoffs than an exchange in which it is randomly determined who moves first.We examine the effect of two treatment variables: Partners versus Strangers and fixed versus changing positions.We do not find much economic justification for establishing fixed roles in exchange relationships.Both with fixed and with changing positions, second movers take advantage of their position by exploiting the first mover by "not delivering" the demanded good.In the fixed positions treatments, exploitation occurs significantly less while reciprocal exchanges happen more often.In spite of this, it turns out that with fixed positions payoffs are very unevenly distributed.Unequal payoff distributions occur both under Partners and Strangers, but they appear to be more extreme among Strangers.

KW - microeconomics

M3 - Discussion paper

VL - 2000-103

T3 - CentER Discussion Paper

BT - Should the Same Side of the Market Always Move First in a Transaction? An Experimental Study

PB - Microeconomics

CY - Tilburg

ER -

van der Heijden ECM, Nelissen JHM, Verbon HAA. Should the Same Side of the Market Always Move First in a Transaction? An Experimental Study. Tilburg: Microeconomics. 2000. (CentER Discussion Paper).