Social capital and the reciprocal nature of family relationships

The perspective of individuals with mild intellectual disability

S.A.H. Giesbers, A.H.C. Hendricks, R.P. Hastings, A. Jahoda, T. Tournier, P.J.C.M. Embregts

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Even though family plays a significant role in the lives of individuals with intellectual disability, little research has included their own views about their families. This study examined how 138 people with mild intellectual disability describe their family group, with a focus on the reciprocal nature of the emotional support in relationships with family members. Participants reported “significant” family members beyond the nuclear family, and parents were seen as the main provider of support. Only half of participants had a support relationship with siblings and just 13% of participants reported partners. About 30% of support was reciprocal, and reciprocity varied greatly with the types of family connection (e.g., siblings, peers). Implications for future research as well as practice are discussed
Original languageEnglish
JournalAmerican Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2019

Fingerprint

Family Relations
Siblings
Nuclear Family
Intellectual Disability
Social Capital
Family Relationships
Parents

Cite this

@article{80250714eb084c3b8a826c6a1de820d0,
title = "Social capital and the reciprocal nature of family relationships: The perspective of individuals with mild intellectual disability",
abstract = "Even though family plays a significant role in the lives of individuals with intellectual disability, little research has included their own views about their families. This study examined how 138 people with mild intellectual disability describe their family group, with a focus on the reciprocal nature of the emotional support in relationships with family members. Participants reported “significant” family members beyond the nuclear family, and parents were seen as the main provider of support. Only half of participants had a support relationship with siblings and just 13{\%} of participants reported partners. About 30{\%} of support was reciprocal, and reciprocity varied greatly with the types of family connection (e.g., siblings, peers). Implications for future research as well as practice are discussed",
author = "S.A.H. Giesbers and A.H.C. Hendricks and R.P. Hastings and A. Jahoda and T. Tournier and P.J.C.M. Embregts",
year = "2019",
language = "English",
journal = "American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities",
issn = "1944-7558",
publisher = "American Association on Mental Retardation",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Social capital and the reciprocal nature of family relationships

T2 - The perspective of individuals with mild intellectual disability

AU - Giesbers, S.A.H.

AU - Hendricks, A.H.C.

AU - Hastings, R.P.

AU - Jahoda, A.

AU - Tournier, T.

AU - Embregts, P.J.C.M.

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Even though family plays a significant role in the lives of individuals with intellectual disability, little research has included their own views about their families. This study examined how 138 people with mild intellectual disability describe their family group, with a focus on the reciprocal nature of the emotional support in relationships with family members. Participants reported “significant” family members beyond the nuclear family, and parents were seen as the main provider of support. Only half of participants had a support relationship with siblings and just 13% of participants reported partners. About 30% of support was reciprocal, and reciprocity varied greatly with the types of family connection (e.g., siblings, peers). Implications for future research as well as practice are discussed

AB - Even though family plays a significant role in the lives of individuals with intellectual disability, little research has included their own views about their families. This study examined how 138 people with mild intellectual disability describe their family group, with a focus on the reciprocal nature of the emotional support in relationships with family members. Participants reported “significant” family members beyond the nuclear family, and parents were seen as the main provider of support. Only half of participants had a support relationship with siblings and just 13% of participants reported partners. About 30% of support was reciprocal, and reciprocity varied greatly with the types of family connection (e.g., siblings, peers). Implications for future research as well as practice are discussed

M3 - Article

JO - American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities

JF - American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities

SN - 1944-7558

ER -