Spousal assaulters in outpatient mental health care: The relevance of structured risk assessment

C.M.B. Serie, C.A. van Tilburg, A. van Dam, C. de Ruiter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

This study examined whether a typology of perpetrators of intimate partner violence (IPV) could be replicated in a Dutch sample (N = 154) of self-referred IPV perpetrators using a structured risk assessment tool for relational violence (Brief Spousal Assault Form for the Evaluation of Risk [B-SAFER]). Our findings support the previous IPV perpetrator subtypes: low-level antisocial (LLA), family only (FO), psychopathology (PP), and generally violent/antisocial (GVA). The subtypes differed on the descriptive dimensions general criminality, substance use, and mental health problems. The prevalence rates for each subtype were roughly comparable with those in previous studies. Contrary to expectation, the prevalence of the GVA subtype was relatively high in our self-referred sample compared with court-referred samples. Our findings suggest that structured risk assessment should be an integral part of the intake procedure for IPV perpetrators entering treatment, to assess their level of risk and to arrive at a tailored risk management strategy, regardless of setting or referral source.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1658–1677
JournalJournal of Interpersonal Violence
Volume32
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

Mental Health
Outpatients
Delivery of Health Care

Cite this

Serie, C.M.B. ; van Tilburg, C.A. ; van Dam, A. ; de Ruiter, C. / Spousal assaulters in outpatient mental health care : The relevance of structured risk assessment. In: Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 2017 ; Vol. 32, No. 11. pp. 1658–1677.
@article{1fdaa8a92390485d8d8b986d075d5dc7,
title = "Spousal assaulters in outpatient mental health care: The relevance of structured risk assessment",
abstract = "This study examined whether a typology of perpetrators of intimate partner violence (IPV) could be replicated in a Dutch sample (N = 154) of self-referred IPV perpetrators using a structured risk assessment tool for relational violence (Brief Spousal Assault Form for the Evaluation of Risk [B-SAFER]). Our findings support the previous IPV perpetrator subtypes: low-level antisocial (LLA), family only (FO), psychopathology (PP), and generally violent/antisocial (GVA). The subtypes differed on the descriptive dimensions general criminality, substance use, and mental health problems. The prevalence rates for each subtype were roughly comparable with those in previous studies. Contrary to expectation, the prevalence of the GVA subtype was relatively high in our self-referred sample compared with court-referred samples. Our findings suggest that structured risk assessment should be an integral part of the intake procedure for IPV perpetrators entering treatment, to assess their level of risk and to arrive at a tailored risk management strategy, regardless of setting or referral source.",
author = "C.M.B. Serie and {van Tilburg}, C.A. and {van Dam}, A. and {de Ruiter}, C.",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1177/0886260515589932",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "1658–1677",
journal = "Journal of Interpersonal Violence",
issn = "0886-2605",
publisher = "Sage Publications, Inc.",
number = "11",

}

Spousal assaulters in outpatient mental health care : The relevance of structured risk assessment. / Serie, C.M.B.; van Tilburg, C.A.; van Dam, A.; de Ruiter, C.

In: Journal of Interpersonal Violence, Vol. 32, No. 11, 2017, p. 1658–1677.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Spousal assaulters in outpatient mental health care

T2 - The relevance of structured risk assessment

AU - Serie, C.M.B.

AU - van Tilburg, C.A.

AU - van Dam, A.

AU - de Ruiter, C.

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - This study examined whether a typology of perpetrators of intimate partner violence (IPV) could be replicated in a Dutch sample (N = 154) of self-referred IPV perpetrators using a structured risk assessment tool for relational violence (Brief Spousal Assault Form for the Evaluation of Risk [B-SAFER]). Our findings support the previous IPV perpetrator subtypes: low-level antisocial (LLA), family only (FO), psychopathology (PP), and generally violent/antisocial (GVA). The subtypes differed on the descriptive dimensions general criminality, substance use, and mental health problems. The prevalence rates for each subtype were roughly comparable with those in previous studies. Contrary to expectation, the prevalence of the GVA subtype was relatively high in our self-referred sample compared with court-referred samples. Our findings suggest that structured risk assessment should be an integral part of the intake procedure for IPV perpetrators entering treatment, to assess their level of risk and to arrive at a tailored risk management strategy, regardless of setting or referral source.

AB - This study examined whether a typology of perpetrators of intimate partner violence (IPV) could be replicated in a Dutch sample (N = 154) of self-referred IPV perpetrators using a structured risk assessment tool for relational violence (Brief Spousal Assault Form for the Evaluation of Risk [B-SAFER]). Our findings support the previous IPV perpetrator subtypes: low-level antisocial (LLA), family only (FO), psychopathology (PP), and generally violent/antisocial (GVA). The subtypes differed on the descriptive dimensions general criminality, substance use, and mental health problems. The prevalence rates for each subtype were roughly comparable with those in previous studies. Contrary to expectation, the prevalence of the GVA subtype was relatively high in our self-referred sample compared with court-referred samples. Our findings suggest that structured risk assessment should be an integral part of the intake procedure for IPV perpetrators entering treatment, to assess their level of risk and to arrive at a tailored risk management strategy, regardless of setting or referral source.

U2 - 10.1177/0886260515589932

DO - 10.1177/0886260515589932

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 1658

EP - 1677

JO - Journal of Interpersonal Violence

JF - Journal of Interpersonal Violence

SN - 0886-2605

IS - 11

ER -