Standard analyses fail to show that US studies overestimate effect sizes in softer research

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Scientific › peer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

74 Downloads (Pure)

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	E712-E713
Journal	Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Volume	111
Issue number	7
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1322149111
Publication status	Published - 2014

Access to Document

@article{1d58ffe1ac254658ab0a13e27e853c16,

title = "Standard analyses fail to show that US studies overestimate effect sizes in softer research",

author = "M.B. Nuijten and {van Assen}, M.A.L.M. and {van Aert}, R.C.M. and J.M. Wicherts",

year = "2014",

doi = "10.1073/pnas.1322149111",

language = "English",

volume = "111",

pages = "E712--E713",

journal = "Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America",

issn = "0027-8424",

publisher = "NATL ACAD SCIENCES",

number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Standard analyses fail to show that US studies overestimate effect sizes in softer research

AU - Nuijten, M.B.

AU - van Assen, M.A.L.M.

AU - van Aert, R.C.M.

AU - Wicherts, J.M.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

U2 - 10.1073/pnas.1322149111

DO - 10.1073/pnas.1322149111

M3 - Article

SN - 0027-8424

VL - 111

SP - E712-E713

JO - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

JF - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

IS - 7

ER -