StatBreak: Identifying “lucky” data points through genetic algorithms (Dataset)

Hannes Rosenbusch*, Leon Hilbert, Anthony Evans, Marcel Zeelenberg

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Non-textual formData set/DatabaseOther research output

Abstract

Sometimes interesting statistical findings are produced by a small number of “lucky” data points within the tested sample. To address this issue, researchers and reviewers are encouraged to investigate outliers and influential data points. Here, we present StatBreak, an easy-to-apply method based on a genetic algorithm, which identifies the observations that most strongly contributed to a hypothesized finding (e.g., effect size, model fit, p-value, Bayes factor). Within a given sample, StatBreak searches for the largest subsample in which a previously observed pattern is not present or reduced below a specifiable threshold. Thus, it answers the question: “Which (and how few) ‘lucky’ cases would need to be excluded from a given sample for data-based conclusion to change?” StatBreak consists of a simple R-function and flags the luckiest data points for any form of statistical analysis. Here, we demonstrate the effectiveness of the method with simulated and real data across a range of study designs and analyses. Additionally, we describe StatBreak’s R-function and explain how researchers and reviewers can apply the method to the data they are working with.
Original languageEnglish
Edition2
Media of outputOnline
Publication statusPublished - 2020

Keywords

  • metapsychology
  • outlier detection
  • replicability
  • robust statistics
  • open materials

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'StatBreak: Identifying “lucky” data points through genetic algorithms (Dataset)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Research Output

    StatBreak: Identifying “lucky” data points through genetic algorithms

    Rosenbusch, H., Hilbert, L., Evans, A. & Zeelenberg, M., 2020, In : Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science. 3, 2, p. 216-228

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    Open Access
    File
  • 17 Downloads (Pure)

    Cite this