Status mismatch and self-reported intimate partner violence in the European Union: Does the country’s context matter?

Lynn van Vugt*, Ioana Pop

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
96 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

We explore whether status mismatch in education or income within couples is associated with self-reported intimate partner violence (IPV) and whether a country’s context relates to this. We used data collected by the ‘FRA Violence Against Women Survey’ in 2012, and we identified three dimensions of self-reported IPV: IPV via controlling behaviour, psychological IPV, and physical IPV. Based on logistic multilevel estimates of approximately 21,000 women in 27 European countries, we found that women, who were higher educated or earned more than their partners, were more likely to report all three types of IPV. We tested the impact of the societal context by looking at gender ideology, crime rates and the acceptance of domestic violence within a country. Our results suggest that only the level of crime directly impacts IPV, albeit only through controlling behaviour and psychological forms. Furthermore, none of the contextual characteristics moderate the relationship between status mismatch and IPV. Therefore, at least in our sample of European countries, the individual-level factors seem to weigh more than the societal context.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)283-309
JournalEuropean Societies
Volume24
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2022

Keywords

  • DIVISION
  • DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
  • European Union
  • GENDER
  • GLOBAL PREVALENCE
  • Intimate partner violence against women
  • NEED
  • RISK
  • WOMEN
  • contextual factors
  • status mismatch

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Status mismatch and self-reported intimate partner violence in the European Union: Does the country’s context matter?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this