Stress sensitization following a disaster: a prospective study

G. Smid, P.G. van der Velden, B.P.R. Gersons, G.J.L.M. Lensvelt-Mulders, J.W. Knipscheer, R.J. Kleber

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

According to the stress sensitization hypothesis, prior exposure to extreme stressors may lead to increased responsiveness to subsequent stressors. It is unclear whether disaster exposure is associated with stress sensitization and, if so, whether this effect is lasting or temporary. This study aimed to investigate the occurrence and duration of stress sensitization prospectively following a major disaster.

METHOD:

Residents affected by a fireworks disaster (n=1083) participated in surveys 2-3 weeks (T1), 18-20 months (T2) and almost 4 years (T3) after the disaster. Participants reported disaster exposure, including direct exposure, injury and damage to their home at T1, and also stressful life events (SLEs) at T2 and T3. Feelings of anxiety and depression, concentration difficulty, hostility, sleep disturbance, and intrusion and avoidance of disaster-related memories were used as indicators of distress.

RESULTS:

Residents whose home was completely destroyed responded with greater distress to SLEs reported 18-20 months following the disaster than residents whose home was less damaged. There were no differences in stress responsiveness almost 4 years after the disaster.

CONCLUSIONS:

During the first years after a disaster, stress sensitization may occur in disaster survivors who experienced extreme disaster exposure. Stress sensitization may explain the persistence or progression of distress over time following extreme stressor exposure.
Original languageEnglish
Article numberdoi: 10.1017/S0033291711002765
Pages (from-to)1675-86
Number of pages12
JournalPsychological Medicine
Volume42
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2012

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Stress sensitization following a disaster: a prospective study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this