Stress, stress-induced cortisol responses, and eyewitness identification performance

M. Sauerland, L. H. C. Raymaekers, H. Otgaar, A. Memon, T. T. Waltjen, M. Nivo, C. Slegers, N. J. Broers, T. Smeets

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

In the eyewitness identification literature, stress and arousal at the time of encoding are considered to adversely influence identification performance. This assumption is in contrast with findings from the neurobiology field of learning and memory, showing that stress and stress hormones are critically involved in forming enduring memories. This discrepancy may be related to methodological differences between the two fields of research, such as the tendency for immediate testing or the use of very short (1–2 hours) retention intervals in eyewitness research, while neurobiology studies insert at least 24 hours. Other differences refer to the extent to which stress‐responsive systems (i.e., the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis) are stimulated effectively under laboratory conditions. The aim of the current study was to conduct an experiment that accounts for the contemporary state of knowledge in both fields. In all, 123 participants witnessed a live staged theft while being exposed to a laboratory stressor that reliably elicits autonomic and glucocorticoid stress responses or while performing a control task. Salivary cortisol levels were measured to control for the effectiveness of the stress induction. One week later, participants attempted to identify the thief from target‐present and target‐absent line‐ups. According to regression and receiver operating characteristic analyses, stress did not have robust detrimental effects on identification performance.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)580-594
JournalBehavioral Sciences & the Law
Volume34
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016
Externally publishedYes

Cite this

Sauerland, M., Raymaekers, L. H. C., Otgaar, H., Memon, A., Waltjen, T. T., Nivo, M., ... Smeets, T. (2016). Stress, stress-induced cortisol responses, and eyewitness identification performance. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 34(4), 580-594. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2249
Sauerland, M. ; Raymaekers, L. H. C. ; Otgaar, H. ; Memon, A. ; Waltjen, T. T. ; Nivo, M. ; Slegers, C. ; Broers, N. J. ; Smeets, T. / Stress, stress-induced cortisol responses, and eyewitness identification performance. In: Behavioral Sciences & the Law. 2016 ; Vol. 34, No. 4. pp. 580-594.
@article{b6a4c21e843c4072a64d2fcafd7ea55d,
title = "Stress, stress-induced cortisol responses, and eyewitness identification performance",
abstract = "In the eyewitness identification literature, stress and arousal at the time of encoding are considered to adversely influence identification performance. This assumption is in contrast with findings from the neurobiology field of learning and memory, showing that stress and stress hormones are critically involved in forming enduring memories. This discrepancy may be related to methodological differences between the two fields of research, such as the tendency for immediate testing or the use of very short (1–2 hours) retention intervals in eyewitness research, while neurobiology studies insert at least 24 hours. Other differences refer to the extent to which stress‐responsive systems (i.e., the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis) are stimulated effectively under laboratory conditions. The aim of the current study was to conduct an experiment that accounts for the contemporary state of knowledge in both fields. In all, 123 participants witnessed a live staged theft while being exposed to a laboratory stressor that reliably elicits autonomic and glucocorticoid stress responses or while performing a control task. Salivary cortisol levels were measured to control for the effectiveness of the stress induction. One week later, participants attempted to identify the thief from target‐present and target‐absent line‐ups. According to regression and receiver operating characteristic analyses, stress did not have robust detrimental effects on identification performance.",
author = "M. Sauerland and Raymaekers, {L. H. C.} and H. Otgaar and A. Memon and Waltjen, {T. T.} and M. Nivo and C. Slegers and Broers, {N. J.} and T. Smeets",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1002/bsl.2249",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "580--594",
journal = "Behavioral Sciences & the Law",
number = "4",

}

Sauerland, M, Raymaekers, LHC, Otgaar, H, Memon, A, Waltjen, TT, Nivo, M, Slegers, C, Broers, NJ & Smeets, T 2016, 'Stress, stress-induced cortisol responses, and eyewitness identification performance', Behavioral Sciences & the Law, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 580-594. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2249

Stress, stress-induced cortisol responses, and eyewitness identification performance. / Sauerland, M.; Raymaekers, L. H. C.; Otgaar, H.; Memon, A.; Waltjen, T. T.; Nivo, M.; Slegers, C.; Broers, N. J.; Smeets, T.

In: Behavioral Sciences & the Law, Vol. 34, No. 4, 2016, p. 580-594.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Stress, stress-induced cortisol responses, and eyewitness identification performance

AU - Sauerland, M.

AU - Raymaekers, L. H. C.

AU - Otgaar, H.

AU - Memon, A.

AU - Waltjen, T. T.

AU - Nivo, M.

AU - Slegers, C.

AU - Broers, N. J.

AU - Smeets, T.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - In the eyewitness identification literature, stress and arousal at the time of encoding are considered to adversely influence identification performance. This assumption is in contrast with findings from the neurobiology field of learning and memory, showing that stress and stress hormones are critically involved in forming enduring memories. This discrepancy may be related to methodological differences between the two fields of research, such as the tendency for immediate testing or the use of very short (1–2 hours) retention intervals in eyewitness research, while neurobiology studies insert at least 24 hours. Other differences refer to the extent to which stress‐responsive systems (i.e., the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis) are stimulated effectively under laboratory conditions. The aim of the current study was to conduct an experiment that accounts for the contemporary state of knowledge in both fields. In all, 123 participants witnessed a live staged theft while being exposed to a laboratory stressor that reliably elicits autonomic and glucocorticoid stress responses or while performing a control task. Salivary cortisol levels were measured to control for the effectiveness of the stress induction. One week later, participants attempted to identify the thief from target‐present and target‐absent line‐ups. According to regression and receiver operating characteristic analyses, stress did not have robust detrimental effects on identification performance.

AB - In the eyewitness identification literature, stress and arousal at the time of encoding are considered to adversely influence identification performance. This assumption is in contrast with findings from the neurobiology field of learning and memory, showing that stress and stress hormones are critically involved in forming enduring memories. This discrepancy may be related to methodological differences between the two fields of research, such as the tendency for immediate testing or the use of very short (1–2 hours) retention intervals in eyewitness research, while neurobiology studies insert at least 24 hours. Other differences refer to the extent to which stress‐responsive systems (i.e., the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis) are stimulated effectively under laboratory conditions. The aim of the current study was to conduct an experiment that accounts for the contemporary state of knowledge in both fields. In all, 123 participants witnessed a live staged theft while being exposed to a laboratory stressor that reliably elicits autonomic and glucocorticoid stress responses or while performing a control task. Salivary cortisol levels were measured to control for the effectiveness of the stress induction. One week later, participants attempted to identify the thief from target‐present and target‐absent line‐ups. According to regression and receiver operating characteristic analyses, stress did not have robust detrimental effects on identification performance.

U2 - 10.1002/bsl.2249

DO - 10.1002/bsl.2249

M3 - Article

VL - 34

SP - 580

EP - 594

JO - Behavioral Sciences & the Law

JF - Behavioral Sciences & the Law

IS - 4

ER -

Sauerland M, Raymaekers LHC, Otgaar H, Memon A, Waltjen TT, Nivo M et al. Stress, stress-induced cortisol responses, and eyewitness identification performance. Behavioral Sciences & the Law. 2016;34(4):580-594. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2249