Structural antecedents of corporate network evolution

F.H. Wijen, N.G. Noorderhaven, W.P.M. Vanhaverbeke

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

While most network studies adopt a static view, we argue that corporate social networks are subject to endogenous dynamics of cognitive path dependence and self-reinforcing power relations. Over time, these dynamics drive corporate networks to become increasingly focused (i.e., more homogeneous, stable, and tightly knit). More focused networks induce organisations to perpetuate existing routines, at the expense of developing new capabilities. We examine the role of organisational structure in maintaining balanced, rather than focused, networks, so that business organisations can realise progressive and timely adjustments to their evolving environments. We develop a theoretical argument, illustrated with the divergent network adjustment patterns of two large, mature companies, suggesting that business organisations with the following structural antecedents are likely to maintain balanced networks: the concurrence of centralisation and decentralisation; a high degree of differentiation and an intermediate level of integration; and an intermediate degree of formalisation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)207-233
JournalInternational Journal of Business Environment
Volume4
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Fingerprint

Network evolution
Business organization
Centralization
Network organization
Power relations
Formalization
Expenses
Social networks
Path dependence
Organizational structure
Large companies
Decentralization

Cite this

@article{82e5ee6eefc04afeb546f091848e8908,
title = "Structural antecedents of corporate network evolution",
abstract = "While most network studies adopt a static view, we argue that corporate social networks are subject to endogenous dynamics of cognitive path dependence and self-reinforcing power relations. Over time, these dynamics drive corporate networks to become increasingly focused (i.e., more homogeneous, stable, and tightly knit). More focused networks induce organisations to perpetuate existing routines, at the expense of developing new capabilities. We examine the role of organisational structure in maintaining balanced, rather than focused, networks, so that business organisations can realise progressive and timely adjustments to their evolving environments. We develop a theoretical argument, illustrated with the divergent network adjustment patterns of two large, mature companies, suggesting that business organisations with the following structural antecedents are likely to maintain balanced networks: the concurrence of centralisation and decentralisation; a high degree of differentiation and an intermediate level of integration; and an intermediate degree of formalisation.",
author = "F.H. Wijen and N.G. Noorderhaven and W.P.M. Vanhaverbeke",
year = "2011",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "207--233",
journal = "International Journal of Business Environment",
issn = "1740-0589",
publisher = "Inderscience Enterprises Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

Structural antecedents of corporate network evolution. / Wijen, F.H.; Noorderhaven, N.G.; Vanhaverbeke, W.P.M.

In: International Journal of Business Environment, Vol. 4, No. 3, 2011, p. 207-233.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Structural antecedents of corporate network evolution

AU - Wijen, F.H.

AU - Noorderhaven, N.G.

AU - Vanhaverbeke, W.P.M.

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - While most network studies adopt a static view, we argue that corporate social networks are subject to endogenous dynamics of cognitive path dependence and self-reinforcing power relations. Over time, these dynamics drive corporate networks to become increasingly focused (i.e., more homogeneous, stable, and tightly knit). More focused networks induce organisations to perpetuate existing routines, at the expense of developing new capabilities. We examine the role of organisational structure in maintaining balanced, rather than focused, networks, so that business organisations can realise progressive and timely adjustments to their evolving environments. We develop a theoretical argument, illustrated with the divergent network adjustment patterns of two large, mature companies, suggesting that business organisations with the following structural antecedents are likely to maintain balanced networks: the concurrence of centralisation and decentralisation; a high degree of differentiation and an intermediate level of integration; and an intermediate degree of formalisation.

AB - While most network studies adopt a static view, we argue that corporate social networks are subject to endogenous dynamics of cognitive path dependence and self-reinforcing power relations. Over time, these dynamics drive corporate networks to become increasingly focused (i.e., more homogeneous, stable, and tightly knit). More focused networks induce organisations to perpetuate existing routines, at the expense of developing new capabilities. We examine the role of organisational structure in maintaining balanced, rather than focused, networks, so that business organisations can realise progressive and timely adjustments to their evolving environments. We develop a theoretical argument, illustrated with the divergent network adjustment patterns of two large, mature companies, suggesting that business organisations with the following structural antecedents are likely to maintain balanced networks: the concurrence of centralisation and decentralisation; a high degree of differentiation and an intermediate level of integration; and an intermediate degree of formalisation.

M3 - Article

VL - 4

SP - 207

EP - 233

JO - International Journal of Business Environment

JF - International Journal of Business Environment

SN - 1740-0589

IS - 3

ER -