Structuring ambiguity in hospital governance

G. Scholten, L. Muijsers-Creemers, J. Moen, R. Bal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

This empirical, multicase research into developing governance structures highlights the strategies of four Dutch hospitals to strengthen their governability. The hospitals studied choose to commit themselves to duality as their starting point for structuring governance arrangements. All of them create positions of doctors and managers that are based on consensual decision making and common responsibility, in this way structuring governance at hospital level and unit level. Interestingly, they consciously choose to create ambiguous positions keeping formalization by rules and job descriptions low. Efficacy of dual hospital governance depends heavily on personal strength, mutual understanding, and trust of the incumbents, which offers new chances for governability but also harbors vulnerability to hospital governance.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)443-457
JournalInternational Journal of Health Planning and Management
Volume34
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Fingerprint

Job Description
Hospital Units

Keywords

  • CHALLENGES
  • Dutch hospitals
  • MANAGEMENT
  • MEDICINE
  • PROFESSIONALS
  • decision-making arrangements
  • dual governance
  • hospital governance
  • structuring

Cite this

Scholten, G. ; Muijsers-Creemers, L. ; Moen, J. ; Bal, R. / Structuring ambiguity in hospital governance. In: International Journal of Health Planning and Management. 2019 ; Vol. 34, No. 1. pp. 443-457.
@article{9f2ea2ce2bb145eba9747d33383795d2,
title = "Structuring ambiguity in hospital governance",
abstract = "This empirical, multicase research into developing governance structures highlights the strategies of four Dutch hospitals to strengthen their governability. The hospitals studied choose to commit themselves to duality as their starting point for structuring governance arrangements. All of them create positions of doctors and managers that are based on consensual decision making and common responsibility, in this way structuring governance at hospital level and unit level. Interestingly, they consciously choose to create ambiguous positions keeping formalization by rules and job descriptions low. Efficacy of dual hospital governance depends heavily on personal strength, mutual understanding, and trust of the incumbents, which offers new chances for governability but also harbors vulnerability to hospital governance.",
keywords = "CHALLENGES, Dutch hospitals, MANAGEMENT, MEDICINE, PROFESSIONALS, decision-making arrangements, dual governance, hospital governance, structuring",
author = "G. Scholten and L. Muijsers-Creemers and J. Moen and R. Bal",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1002/hpm.2693",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "443--457",
journal = "International Journal of Health Planning and Management",
issn = "1099-1751",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

Structuring ambiguity in hospital governance. / Scholten, G.; Muijsers-Creemers, L.; Moen, J.; Bal, R.

In: International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Vol. 34, No. 1, 2019, p. 443-457.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Structuring ambiguity in hospital governance

AU - Scholten, G.

AU - Muijsers-Creemers, L.

AU - Moen, J.

AU - Bal, R.

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - This empirical, multicase research into developing governance structures highlights the strategies of four Dutch hospitals to strengthen their governability. The hospitals studied choose to commit themselves to duality as their starting point for structuring governance arrangements. All of them create positions of doctors and managers that are based on consensual decision making and common responsibility, in this way structuring governance at hospital level and unit level. Interestingly, they consciously choose to create ambiguous positions keeping formalization by rules and job descriptions low. Efficacy of dual hospital governance depends heavily on personal strength, mutual understanding, and trust of the incumbents, which offers new chances for governability but also harbors vulnerability to hospital governance.

AB - This empirical, multicase research into developing governance structures highlights the strategies of four Dutch hospitals to strengthen their governability. The hospitals studied choose to commit themselves to duality as their starting point for structuring governance arrangements. All of them create positions of doctors and managers that are based on consensual decision making and common responsibility, in this way structuring governance at hospital level and unit level. Interestingly, they consciously choose to create ambiguous positions keeping formalization by rules and job descriptions low. Efficacy of dual hospital governance depends heavily on personal strength, mutual understanding, and trust of the incumbents, which offers new chances for governability but also harbors vulnerability to hospital governance.

KW - CHALLENGES

KW - Dutch hospitals

KW - MANAGEMENT

KW - MEDICINE

KW - PROFESSIONALS

KW - decision-making arrangements

KW - dual governance

KW - hospital governance

KW - structuring

U2 - 10.1002/hpm.2693

DO - 10.1002/hpm.2693

M3 - Article

VL - 34

SP - 443

EP - 457

JO - International Journal of Health Planning and Management

JF - International Journal of Health Planning and Management

SN - 1099-1751

IS - 1

ER -