Supervising Cross-Border Banks: Theory, Evidence and Policy (Revised version of CentER Discussion Paper 2011-127)

T.H.L. Beck, R.I. Todorov, W.B. Wagner

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paperOther research output

391 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Abstract: This paper analyzes the distortions that banks’ cross-border activities, such as foreign assets, deposits and equity, can introduce into regulatory interventions. We find that while each individual dimension of cross-border activities distorts the incentives of a domestic regulator, a balanced amount of cross-border activities does not necessarily cause inefficiencies, as the various distortions can offset each other. Empirical analysis using bank-level data from the recent crisis provide support to our theoretical findings. Specifically, banks with a higher share of foreign deposits and assets and a lower foreign equity share were intervened at a more fragile state, reflecting the distorted incentives of national regulators. We discuss several implications for the supervision of cross-border banks in Europe.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationTilburg
PublisherEconomics
Number of pages43
Volume2012-059
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Publication series

NameCentER Discussion Paper
Volume2012-059

Fingerprint

Cross-border
Equity
Deposits
Assets
Incentives
Supervision
Inefficiency
Empirical analysis

Keywords

  • Bank regulation
  • bank resolution
  • cross-border banking

Cite this

Beck, T. H. L., Todorov, R. I., & Wagner, W. B. (2012). Supervising Cross-Border Banks: Theory, Evidence and Policy (Revised version of CentER Discussion Paper 2011-127). (CentER Discussion Paper; Vol. 2012-059). Tilburg: Economics.
Beck, T.H.L. ; Todorov, R.I. ; Wagner, W.B. / Supervising Cross-Border Banks : Theory, Evidence and Policy (Revised version of CentER Discussion Paper 2011-127). Tilburg : Economics, 2012. (CentER Discussion Paper).
@techreport{1aedf83e1ca544b5bc6dd56eb7c0b8a2,
title = "Supervising Cross-Border Banks: Theory, Evidence and Policy (Revised version of CentER Discussion Paper 2011-127)",
abstract = "Abstract: This paper analyzes the distortions that banks’ cross-border activities, such as foreign assets, deposits and equity, can introduce into regulatory interventions. We find that while each individual dimension of cross-border activities distorts the incentives of a domestic regulator, a balanced amount of cross-border activities does not necessarily cause inefficiencies, as the various distortions can offset each other. Empirical analysis using bank-level data from the recent crisis provide support to our theoretical findings. Specifically, banks with a higher share of foreign deposits and assets and a lower foreign equity share were intervened at a more fragile state, reflecting the distorted incentives of national regulators. We discuss several implications for the supervision of cross-border banks in Europe.",
keywords = "Bank regulation, bank resolution, cross-border banking",
author = "T.H.L. Beck and R.I. Todorov and W.B. Wagner",
note = "This is also EBC Discussion Paper 2012-015 Pagination: 43",
year = "2012",
language = "English",
volume = "2012-059",
series = "CentER Discussion Paper",
publisher = "Economics",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "Economics",

}

Beck, THL, Todorov, RI & Wagner, WB 2012 'Supervising Cross-Border Banks: Theory, Evidence and Policy (Revised version of CentER Discussion Paper 2011-127)' CentER Discussion Paper, vol. 2012-059, Economics, Tilburg.

Supervising Cross-Border Banks : Theory, Evidence and Policy (Revised version of CentER Discussion Paper 2011-127). / Beck, T.H.L.; Todorov, R.I.; Wagner, W.B.

Tilburg : Economics, 2012. (CentER Discussion Paper; Vol. 2012-059).

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paperOther research output

TY - UNPB

T1 - Supervising Cross-Border Banks

T2 - Theory, Evidence and Policy (Revised version of CentER Discussion Paper 2011-127)

AU - Beck, T.H.L.

AU - Todorov, R.I.

AU - Wagner, W.B.

N1 - This is also EBC Discussion Paper 2012-015 Pagination: 43

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Abstract: This paper analyzes the distortions that banks’ cross-border activities, such as foreign assets, deposits and equity, can introduce into regulatory interventions. We find that while each individual dimension of cross-border activities distorts the incentives of a domestic regulator, a balanced amount of cross-border activities does not necessarily cause inefficiencies, as the various distortions can offset each other. Empirical analysis using bank-level data from the recent crisis provide support to our theoretical findings. Specifically, banks with a higher share of foreign deposits and assets and a lower foreign equity share were intervened at a more fragile state, reflecting the distorted incentives of national regulators. We discuss several implications for the supervision of cross-border banks in Europe.

AB - Abstract: This paper analyzes the distortions that banks’ cross-border activities, such as foreign assets, deposits and equity, can introduce into regulatory interventions. We find that while each individual dimension of cross-border activities distorts the incentives of a domestic regulator, a balanced amount of cross-border activities does not necessarily cause inefficiencies, as the various distortions can offset each other. Empirical analysis using bank-level data from the recent crisis provide support to our theoretical findings. Specifically, banks with a higher share of foreign deposits and assets and a lower foreign equity share were intervened at a more fragile state, reflecting the distorted incentives of national regulators. We discuss several implications for the supervision of cross-border banks in Europe.

KW - Bank regulation

KW - bank resolution

KW - cross-border banking

M3 - Discussion paper

VL - 2012-059

T3 - CentER Discussion Paper

BT - Supervising Cross-Border Banks

PB - Economics

CY - Tilburg

ER -

Beck THL, Todorov RI, Wagner WB. Supervising Cross-Border Banks: Theory, Evidence and Policy (Revised version of CentER Discussion Paper 2011-127). Tilburg: Economics. 2012. (CentER Discussion Paper).