TY - JOUR
T1 - Sustainability reporting as a social construct
T2 - the systematic literature review within socio-political view
AU - Aluchna, Maria
AU - Roszkowska-Menkes, Maria
AU - Jastrzębska, Ewa
AU - Bohdanowicz, Leszek
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, Emerald Publishing Limited.
PY - 2023/10/18
Y1 - 2023/10/18
N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to investigate the role of socio-political interactions in determining the topos of sustainability reporting (SR) practice. For this purpose, this study harnesses pragmatic constructivism perspective to identify facts, possibilities, values and communication of SR practice. Design/methodology/approach: This study adopts a systematic literature review approach using a sample of 167 articles from 54 academic journals. Findings: The results of this study indicate that companies in their SR are driven by self-interest, treating disclosure as a mean in itself and neglecting its role in sustainability transition. In the light of the results, this study proposes three main avenues for further research: the interplay of institutional, organizational and individual factors as drivers for transparency; approaches to improve the quality of SR; and (3) sustainability impact of SR. Originality/value: The past decade has seen a proliferation of literature on the practice of SR. One of the most influential streams in studies on SR has been grounded in socio-political theories with legitimacy, stakeholder and institutional theories on the front. Nevertheless, there is still no systematic and comprehensive overview of this rich literature. This study offers a comprehensive framework which conceptualizes SR as a social construct defined by the interplay between various, often conflicting institutional demands.
AB - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to investigate the role of socio-political interactions in determining the topos of sustainability reporting (SR) practice. For this purpose, this study harnesses pragmatic constructivism perspective to identify facts, possibilities, values and communication of SR practice. Design/methodology/approach: This study adopts a systematic literature review approach using a sample of 167 articles from 54 academic journals. Findings: The results of this study indicate that companies in their SR are driven by self-interest, treating disclosure as a mean in itself and neglecting its role in sustainability transition. In the light of the results, this study proposes three main avenues for further research: the interplay of institutional, organizational and individual factors as drivers for transparency; approaches to improve the quality of SR; and (3) sustainability impact of SR. Originality/value: The past decade has seen a proliferation of literature on the practice of SR. One of the most influential streams in studies on SR has been grounded in socio-political theories with legitimacy, stakeholder and institutional theories on the front. Nevertheless, there is still no systematic and comprehensive overview of this rich literature. This study offers a comprehensive framework which conceptualizes SR as a social construct defined by the interplay between various, often conflicting institutional demands.
KW - Institutional theory
KW - Legitimacy theory
KW - Literature review
KW - Non-financial reporting
KW - Pragmatic constructivism
KW - Stakeholder theory
KW - Sustainability reporting
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85147432417&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1108/SRJ-06-2022-0231
DO - 10.1108/SRJ-06-2022-0231
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85147432417
SN - 1747-1117
VL - 19
SP - 1535
EP - 1554
JO - Social Responsibility Journal
JF - Social Responsibility Journal
IS - 8
ER -