Abstract
When it comes to international economic sanctions, the most frequent goal is regime change and democratization. Yet, past experiences suggest that such sanctions are often ineffective; moreover, quite paradoxically, targeted regimes tend to respond with policies that amplify the sanctions’ harmful effects. This paper offers a political-economy model which provides an explanation for these observations. An autocratic regime lowers the supply of public goods to reduce private-sector productivity and hence the resources of potential challengers. As a result, sanctions-induced challenges become less likely, thereby buying the regime time to find exile opportunities. If these opportunities turn out to be of low quality, the regime prefers to hold out – and the sanctions fail.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 24-40 |
| Journal | European Journal of Political Economy |
| Volume | 36 |
| Early online date | 11 Jul 2014 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Dec 2014 |
Keywords
- Economic sanctions
- regime change
- democratization
- public goods
- exile
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Targeting autocrats: Economic sanctions and regime change'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver