Abstract
The author posits that the XX ruling (implicitly) repeals or at least mitigates the outlier ruling Société Générale (C-17/14). The CJEU should clarify in a subsequent ruling that it repealed the Société Générale (C-17/14) ruling in full because a full repeal would contribute most to the development of the EU internal market. Nevertheless, the ruling contributes to the development of the EU internal market, the creation of a level playing field, the establishment of international tax neutrality, to capital and labour import neutrality, the realisation of the ability-to-pay and the direct-benefit principles, occasionally to the establishment of an origin-based allocation of tax jurisdiction on dividend income and to a certain extent to the realisation of some of the SDGs 1, 8, 10, 16 and 17. Therefore, the author welcomes this ruling.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 210-221 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | EC Tax Review |
| Volume | 34 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2025 |
Keywords
- Dividend withholding tax
- Deductible expenses
- internal market EU
- Sustainable Development Goals
- level playing field
- international tax neutrality
- capital and labour import neutrality
- ability-to-pay principle
- direct-benefit principle
- origin-based allocation of tax jurisdiction
- EU tax law
- free movement of capital
- dividend
- internal market
- capital markets