Teaching inductive reasoning in primary education

E. de Koning, J.H.M. Hamers, K. Sijtsma, A. Vermeer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

828 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Results demonstrated that the teachers were able to apply the programs as intended, although they needed support to shift their attention from the reasoning product to the reasoning process. They also experienced difficulties in implementing the role swap between the teacher and the pupils in the third phase of the teaching procedure. The pupils who were administered the programs significantly outperformed pupils from the control condition on near-transfer tests. Doubly taught pupils (i.e., in Grade 3 and Grade 4) significantly outperformed singly taught pupils on a far-transfer test, and singly taught pupils significantly outperformed pupils from the control condition. The learning effects of both programs indicated that pupils' better performance was due to their increased inductive reasoning ability. Suggestions are provided for improving the teaching programs and for future research on developmentally appropriate and cognitively based change in education.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)211-241
JournalDevelopmental Review
Volume22
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2002

Fingerprint

primary education
pupil
Education
Teaching
school grade
teaching program
learning success
teacher
ability
performance

Cite this

de Koning, E., Hamers, J. H. M., Sijtsma, K., & Vermeer, A. (2002). Teaching inductive reasoning in primary education. Developmental Review, 22(2), 211-241.
de Koning, E. ; Hamers, J.H.M. ; Sijtsma, K. ; Vermeer, A. / Teaching inductive reasoning in primary education. In: Developmental Review. 2002 ; Vol. 22, No. 2. pp. 211-241.
@article{da09516a54de4d00b780976e1555b1ee,
title = "Teaching inductive reasoning in primary education",
abstract = "Results demonstrated that the teachers were able to apply the programs as intended, although they needed support to shift their attention from the reasoning product to the reasoning process. They also experienced difficulties in implementing the role swap between the teacher and the pupils in the third phase of the teaching procedure. The pupils who were administered the programs significantly outperformed pupils from the control condition on near-transfer tests. Doubly taught pupils (i.e., in Grade 3 and Grade 4) significantly outperformed singly taught pupils on a far-transfer test, and singly taught pupils significantly outperformed pupils from the control condition. The learning effects of both programs indicated that pupils' better performance was due to their increased inductive reasoning ability. Suggestions are provided for improving the teaching programs and for future research on developmentally appropriate and cognitively based change in education.",
author = "{de Koning}, E. and J.H.M. Hamers and K. Sijtsma and A. Vermeer",
year = "2002",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "211--241",
journal = "Developmental Review",
issn = "0273-2297",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "2",

}

de Koning, E, Hamers, JHM, Sijtsma, K & Vermeer, A 2002, 'Teaching inductive reasoning in primary education', Developmental Review, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 211-241.

Teaching inductive reasoning in primary education. / de Koning, E.; Hamers, J.H.M.; Sijtsma, K.; Vermeer, A.

In: Developmental Review, Vol. 22, No. 2, 2002, p. 211-241.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Teaching inductive reasoning in primary education

AU - de Koning, E.

AU - Hamers, J.H.M.

AU - Sijtsma, K.

AU - Vermeer, A.

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - Results demonstrated that the teachers were able to apply the programs as intended, although they needed support to shift their attention from the reasoning product to the reasoning process. They also experienced difficulties in implementing the role swap between the teacher and the pupils in the third phase of the teaching procedure. The pupils who were administered the programs significantly outperformed pupils from the control condition on near-transfer tests. Doubly taught pupils (i.e., in Grade 3 and Grade 4) significantly outperformed singly taught pupils on a far-transfer test, and singly taught pupils significantly outperformed pupils from the control condition. The learning effects of both programs indicated that pupils' better performance was due to their increased inductive reasoning ability. Suggestions are provided for improving the teaching programs and for future research on developmentally appropriate and cognitively based change in education.

AB - Results demonstrated that the teachers were able to apply the programs as intended, although they needed support to shift their attention from the reasoning product to the reasoning process. They also experienced difficulties in implementing the role swap between the teacher and the pupils in the third phase of the teaching procedure. The pupils who were administered the programs significantly outperformed pupils from the control condition on near-transfer tests. Doubly taught pupils (i.e., in Grade 3 and Grade 4) significantly outperformed singly taught pupils on a far-transfer test, and singly taught pupils significantly outperformed pupils from the control condition. The learning effects of both programs indicated that pupils' better performance was due to their increased inductive reasoning ability. Suggestions are provided for improving the teaching programs and for future research on developmentally appropriate and cognitively based change in education.

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 211

EP - 241

JO - Developmental Review

JF - Developmental Review

SN - 0273-2297

IS - 2

ER -

de Koning E, Hamers JHM, Sijtsma K, Vermeer A. Teaching inductive reasoning in primary education. Developmental Review. 2002;22(2):211-241.