Technology for our future? Exploring the duty to report and processes of subjectification relating to digitalized suicide prevention

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Digital and networking technologies are increasingly used to predict who is at risk of attempting suicide. Such digitalized suicide prevention within and beyond mental health care raises ethical, social and legal issues for a range of actors involved. Here, I will draw on key literature to explore what issues (might) arise in relation to digitalized suicide prevention practices. I will start by reviewing some of the initiatives that are already implemented, and address some of the issues associated with these and with potential future initiatives. Rather than addressing the breadth of issues, however, I will then zoom in on two key issues: first, the duty of care and the duty to report, and how these two legal and professional standards may change within and through digitalized suicide prevention; and secondly a more philosophical exploration of how digitalized suicide prevention may alter human subjectivity. To end with the by now famous adagio, digitalized suicide prevention is neither good nor bad, nor is it neutral, and I will argue that we need sustained academic and social conversation about who can and should be involved in digitalized suicide prevention practices and, indeed, in what ways it can and should (not) happen.
Original languageEnglish
Article number170
Number of pages12
JournalInformation
Volume11
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2020

Keywords

  • Digitalization
  • Ethics
  • Healthcare
  • Law
  • Subjectivity
  • Suicide prevention

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Technology for our future? Exploring the duty to report and processes of subjectification relating to digitalized suicide prevention'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this