Temporal Displacement of Environmental Crime

Evidence from Marine Oil Pollution

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paperOther research output

569 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The probability of conviction commonly varies across different circumstances due to imperfect monitoring. Evidence of whether and how offenders exploit gaps in monitoring provides insight into the process by which deterrence is produced. We present an empirical test of temporal displacement of illegal discharges of oil from shipping, a major source of ocean pollution, in response to a monitoring technology that features variation in the probability of conviction by time of day. After sunset and before sunrise, evidence collected using airborne radar day-round becomes contestable in court because the nature of an identified spot cannot be verified visually. Using data from surveillance flights
above the Dutch part of the North Sea during 1992-2011, we only find evidence for temporal displacement after 1999, with further tightening of the regulations. By that time, the overall level of discharges had been reduced considerably, making the observed temporal displacement relatively small in absolute levels.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationTilburg
PublisherTILEC
Number of pages25
Volume2015-014
Publication statusPublished - 21 Jul 2015

Publication series

NameTILEC Discussion Paper
Volume2015-014

Fingerprint

marine pollution
oil pollution
monitoring
shipping
radar
pollution
oil
ocean
environmental crime

Keywords

  • deterrence
  • pollution
  • environmentel crime

Cite this

Vollaard, B. (2015). Temporal Displacement of Environmental Crime: Evidence from Marine Oil Pollution. (TILEC Discussion Paper; Vol. 2015-014). Tilburg: TILEC.
@techreport{6bbaaff74d6f4c9e987bfd89aea7c235,
title = "Temporal Displacement of Environmental Crime: Evidence from Marine Oil Pollution",
abstract = "The probability of conviction commonly varies across different circumstances due to imperfect monitoring. Evidence of whether and how offenders exploit gaps in monitoring provides insight into the process by which deterrence is produced. We present an empirical test of temporal displacement of illegal discharges of oil from shipping, a major source of ocean pollution, in response to a monitoring technology that features variation in the probability of conviction by time of day. After sunset and before sunrise, evidence collected using airborne radar day-round becomes contestable in court because the nature of an identified spot cannot be verified visually. Using data from surveillance flightsabove the Dutch part of the North Sea during 1992-2011, we only find evidence for temporal displacement after 1999, with further tightening of the regulations. By that time, the overall level of discharges had been reduced considerably, making the observed temporal displacement relatively small in absolute levels.",
keywords = "deterrence, pollution, environmentel crime",
author = "Ben Vollaard",
year = "2015",
month = "7",
day = "21",
language = "English",
volume = "2015-014",
series = "TILEC Discussion Paper",
publisher = "TILEC",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "TILEC",

}

Vollaard, B 2015 'Temporal Displacement of Environmental Crime: Evidence from Marine Oil Pollution' TILEC Discussion Paper, vol. 2015-014, TILEC, Tilburg.

Temporal Displacement of Environmental Crime : Evidence from Marine Oil Pollution. / Vollaard, Ben.

Tilburg : TILEC, 2015. (TILEC Discussion Paper; Vol. 2015-014).

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paperOther research output

TY - UNPB

T1 - Temporal Displacement of Environmental Crime

T2 - Evidence from Marine Oil Pollution

AU - Vollaard, Ben

PY - 2015/7/21

Y1 - 2015/7/21

N2 - The probability of conviction commonly varies across different circumstances due to imperfect monitoring. Evidence of whether and how offenders exploit gaps in monitoring provides insight into the process by which deterrence is produced. We present an empirical test of temporal displacement of illegal discharges of oil from shipping, a major source of ocean pollution, in response to a monitoring technology that features variation in the probability of conviction by time of day. After sunset and before sunrise, evidence collected using airborne radar day-round becomes contestable in court because the nature of an identified spot cannot be verified visually. Using data from surveillance flightsabove the Dutch part of the North Sea during 1992-2011, we only find evidence for temporal displacement after 1999, with further tightening of the regulations. By that time, the overall level of discharges had been reduced considerably, making the observed temporal displacement relatively small in absolute levels.

AB - The probability of conviction commonly varies across different circumstances due to imperfect monitoring. Evidence of whether and how offenders exploit gaps in monitoring provides insight into the process by which deterrence is produced. We present an empirical test of temporal displacement of illegal discharges of oil from shipping, a major source of ocean pollution, in response to a monitoring technology that features variation in the probability of conviction by time of day. After sunset and before sunrise, evidence collected using airborne radar day-round becomes contestable in court because the nature of an identified spot cannot be verified visually. Using data from surveillance flightsabove the Dutch part of the North Sea during 1992-2011, we only find evidence for temporal displacement after 1999, with further tightening of the regulations. By that time, the overall level of discharges had been reduced considerably, making the observed temporal displacement relatively small in absolute levels.

KW - deterrence

KW - pollution

KW - environmentel crime

M3 - Discussion paper

VL - 2015-014

T3 - TILEC Discussion Paper

BT - Temporal Displacement of Environmental Crime

PB - TILEC

CY - Tilburg

ER -