Temptation-based reasoning: When tempted, everything becomes a (better) reason to indulge

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Building on theories of motivated reasoning and reason-based choice, we propose that people interpret reasons for indulgence in a different light depending on how tempting behavior is. Experiments 1a and 1b find that the more tempting the behavior is, the more people think a given reason ("it is a Tuesday") is an acceptable reason to indulge. Furthermore, we find that both recalled prior good behavior (Experiment 2a) and recalled prior frustrations (Experiment 2b) are interpreted as good reasons to indulge when confronted with tempting behavior. Finally, Experiment 3 replicates that people see a prior good deed (taking part in the studies) as a better reason for indulgence when the indulgence is more tempting, which makes them more likely to actually choose an unhealthy food option. This process of temptation-based reasoning sheds new light on existing theories on how people deal with temptations, notably those on self-licensing, comfort buying, and comfort eating.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)185-209
JournalJournal of Marketing Behavior
Volume3
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2018

Fingerprint

Temptation
Experiment
Licensing
Motivated reasoning
Food

Keywords

  • motivated reasoning
  • reason-based choice
  • temptation
  • indulgence
  • self-licensing

Cite this

@article{2d4ef71ea23b47ee828d9c3ba1053b66,
title = "Temptation-based reasoning: When tempted, everything becomes a (better) reason to indulge",
abstract = "Building on theories of motivated reasoning and reason-based choice, we propose that people interpret reasons for indulgence in a different light depending on how tempting behavior is. Experiments 1a and 1b find that the more tempting the behavior is, the more people think a given reason ({"}it is a Tuesday{"}) is an acceptable reason to indulge. Furthermore, we find that both recalled prior good behavior (Experiment 2a) and recalled prior frustrations (Experiment 2b) are interpreted as good reasons to indulge when confronted with tempting behavior. Finally, Experiment 3 replicates that people see a prior good deed (taking part in the studies) as a better reason for indulgence when the indulgence is more tempting, which makes them more likely to actually choose an unhealthy food option. This process of temptation-based reasoning sheds new light on existing theories on how people deal with temptations, notably those on self-licensing, comfort buying, and comfort eating.",
keywords = "motivated reasoning, reason-based choice, temptation, indulgence, self-licensing",
author = "{van de Ven}, Niels and Irene Blanken and Marcel Zeelenberg",
year = "2018",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1561/107.00000047",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "185--209",
journal = "Journal of Marketing Behavior",
issn = "2326-5698",
number = "3",

}

Temptation-based reasoning : When tempted, everything becomes a (better) reason to indulge. / van de Ven, Niels; Blanken, Irene; Zeelenberg, Marcel.

In: Journal of Marketing Behavior, Vol. 3, No. 3, 12.2018, p. 185-209.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Temptation-based reasoning

T2 - When tempted, everything becomes a (better) reason to indulge

AU - van de Ven, Niels

AU - Blanken, Irene

AU - Zeelenberg, Marcel

PY - 2018/12

Y1 - 2018/12

N2 - Building on theories of motivated reasoning and reason-based choice, we propose that people interpret reasons for indulgence in a different light depending on how tempting behavior is. Experiments 1a and 1b find that the more tempting the behavior is, the more people think a given reason ("it is a Tuesday") is an acceptable reason to indulge. Furthermore, we find that both recalled prior good behavior (Experiment 2a) and recalled prior frustrations (Experiment 2b) are interpreted as good reasons to indulge when confronted with tempting behavior. Finally, Experiment 3 replicates that people see a prior good deed (taking part in the studies) as a better reason for indulgence when the indulgence is more tempting, which makes them more likely to actually choose an unhealthy food option. This process of temptation-based reasoning sheds new light on existing theories on how people deal with temptations, notably those on self-licensing, comfort buying, and comfort eating.

AB - Building on theories of motivated reasoning and reason-based choice, we propose that people interpret reasons for indulgence in a different light depending on how tempting behavior is. Experiments 1a and 1b find that the more tempting the behavior is, the more people think a given reason ("it is a Tuesday") is an acceptable reason to indulge. Furthermore, we find that both recalled prior good behavior (Experiment 2a) and recalled prior frustrations (Experiment 2b) are interpreted as good reasons to indulge when confronted with tempting behavior. Finally, Experiment 3 replicates that people see a prior good deed (taking part in the studies) as a better reason for indulgence when the indulgence is more tempting, which makes them more likely to actually choose an unhealthy food option. This process of temptation-based reasoning sheds new light on existing theories on how people deal with temptations, notably those on self-licensing, comfort buying, and comfort eating.

KW - motivated reasoning

KW - reason-based choice

KW - temptation

KW - indulgence

KW - self-licensing

U2 - 10.1561/107.00000047

DO - 10.1561/107.00000047

M3 - Article

VL - 3

SP - 185

EP - 209

JO - Journal of Marketing Behavior

JF - Journal of Marketing Behavior

SN - 2326-5698

IS - 3

ER -