Testing for prudence and skewness seeking

S. Ebert, D. Wiesen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Numerous theoretical predictions such as precautionary saving or preventive behavior have been derived for prudent decision makers. Further, prudence can be characterized as downside risk aversion and plays a key role in preference for skewness. We use a simple experimental method to test for prudence and skewness preference in the laboratory and compare the two. To this end, we introduce a novel graphical representation of compound lotteries that is easily accessible to subjects and test it for robustness, using a factorial design. Prudence is observed on the aggregate and individual level. We find that prudence does not boil down to skewness seeking. We further provide some theoretical explanations for this result.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1334-1349
JournalManagement Science
Volume57
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Skewness
Testing
Prudence
Lottery
Prediction
Decision maker
Experimental method
Factorial design
Precautionary saving
Robustness
Downside risk aversion

Cite this

Ebert, S. ; Wiesen, D. / Testing for prudence and skewness seeking. In: Management Science. 2011 ; Vol. 57, No. 7. pp. 1334-1349.
@article{2b564c0f532d4314a2330c4bf35a5960,
title = "Testing for prudence and skewness seeking",
abstract = "Numerous theoretical predictions such as precautionary saving or preventive behavior have been derived for prudent decision makers. Further, prudence can be characterized as downside risk aversion and plays a key role in preference for skewness. We use a simple experimental method to test for prudence and skewness preference in the laboratory and compare the two. To this end, we introduce a novel graphical representation of compound lotteries that is easily accessible to subjects and test it for robustness, using a factorial design. Prudence is observed on the aggregate and individual level. We find that prudence does not boil down to skewness seeking. We further provide some theoretical explanations for this result.",
author = "S. Ebert and D. Wiesen",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1287/mnsc.1110.1354",
language = "English",
volume = "57",
pages = "1334--1349",
journal = "Management Science",
issn = "0025-1909",
publisher = "INFORMS Inst.for Operations Res.and the Management Sciences",
number = "7",

}

Testing for prudence and skewness seeking. / Ebert, S.; Wiesen, D.

In: Management Science, Vol. 57, No. 7, 2011, p. 1334-1349.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Testing for prudence and skewness seeking

AU - Ebert, S.

AU - Wiesen, D.

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Numerous theoretical predictions such as precautionary saving or preventive behavior have been derived for prudent decision makers. Further, prudence can be characterized as downside risk aversion and plays a key role in preference for skewness. We use a simple experimental method to test for prudence and skewness preference in the laboratory and compare the two. To this end, we introduce a novel graphical representation of compound lotteries that is easily accessible to subjects and test it for robustness, using a factorial design. Prudence is observed on the aggregate and individual level. We find that prudence does not boil down to skewness seeking. We further provide some theoretical explanations for this result.

AB - Numerous theoretical predictions such as precautionary saving or preventive behavior have been derived for prudent decision makers. Further, prudence can be characterized as downside risk aversion and plays a key role in preference for skewness. We use a simple experimental method to test for prudence and skewness preference in the laboratory and compare the two. To this end, we introduce a novel graphical representation of compound lotteries that is easily accessible to subjects and test it for robustness, using a factorial design. Prudence is observed on the aggregate and individual level. We find that prudence does not boil down to skewness seeking. We further provide some theoretical explanations for this result.

U2 - 10.1287/mnsc.1110.1354

DO - 10.1287/mnsc.1110.1354

M3 - Article

VL - 57

SP - 1334

EP - 1349

JO - Management Science

JF - Management Science

SN - 0025-1909

IS - 7

ER -