The advocate’s own challenges to behave in a sustainable way: An institutional analysis of advocacy NGOs

Mieneke Koster, Ana Simaens, Bart Vos

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) are increasingly important drivers for businesses’ self-regulation to operate in a sustainable way. We shift the perspective on NGOs from focusing on their advocacy role to focusing on their accountability for having sustainable internal operations. In a multiple case analysis, we explore the question ‘What are the drivers and barriers to sustainable conduct of NGOs that are sustainability advocates?’ Drawing on institutional theory, we obtain novel insights into the legitimacy-seeking motivations for sustainable conduct in the specific context of advocacy NGOs. We found that, affected by its mission, (1) the cultural-cognitive drive is particularly high, with sustainable conduct as an internally ‘taken-for-granted’ behavior, followed by (2) the normative drivers, with the balance between perceived vulnerability of needing to ‘walk the talk’ and the sense of immunity due to lack of external scrutiny, and (3) there are hardly any regulative drivers. Furthermore, these organizations face idiosyncratic trade-offs when balancing investments in their advocacy missions with investments in sustainable operations, reflecting ethical dilemmas. In a broader sense, this research elucidates the way advocates cope in situations of institutional complexity, with conflicting institutional demands between their mission and role-model function.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)483-501
JournalJournal of Business Ethics
Volume157
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2019

Fingerprint

driver
immunity
role model
self-regulation
legitimacy
vulnerability
sustainability
Advocacy
Non-governmental Organizations
Non-governmental organizations
Institutional analysis
responsibility
lack
Self-regulation
Scrutiny
Accountability
Sustainability
Immunity
Legitimacy
Ethical Dilemmas

Keywords

  • institutional complexity
  • legitimacy
  • multiple cases
  • non-governmental organizations (NGOs)
  • sustainability

Cite this

@article{09cba5c354d64aa1919d8b75e5aefc68,
title = "The advocate’s own challenges to behave in a sustainable way: An institutional analysis of advocacy NGOs",
abstract = "Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) are increasingly important drivers for businesses’ self-regulation to operate in a sustainable way. We shift the perspective on NGOs from focusing on their advocacy role to focusing on their accountability for having sustainable internal operations. In a multiple case analysis, we explore the question ‘What are the drivers and barriers to sustainable conduct of NGOs that are sustainability advocates?’ Drawing on institutional theory, we obtain novel insights into the legitimacy-seeking motivations for sustainable conduct in the specific context of advocacy NGOs. We found that, affected by its mission, (1) the cultural-cognitive drive is particularly high, with sustainable conduct as an internally ‘taken-for-granted’ behavior, followed by (2) the normative drivers, with the balance between perceived vulnerability of needing to ‘walk the talk’ and the sense of immunity due to lack of external scrutiny, and (3) there are hardly any regulative drivers. Furthermore, these organizations face idiosyncratic trade-offs when balancing investments in their advocacy missions with investments in sustainable operations, reflecting ethical dilemmas. In a broader sense, this research elucidates the way advocates cope in situations of institutional complexity, with conflicting institutional demands between their mission and role-model function.",
keywords = "institutional complexity, legitimacy, multiple cases, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), sustainability",
author = "Mieneke Koster and Ana Simaens and Bart Vos",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1007/s10551-017-3674-4",
language = "English",
volume = "157",
pages = "483--501",
journal = "Journal of Business Ethics",
issn = "0167-4544",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "2",

}

The advocate’s own challenges to behave in a sustainable way : An institutional analysis of advocacy NGOs. / Koster, Mieneke; Simaens, Ana; Vos, Bart.

In: Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 157, No. 2, 06.2019, p. 483-501.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The advocate’s own challenges to behave in a sustainable way

T2 - An institutional analysis of advocacy NGOs

AU - Koster, Mieneke

AU - Simaens, Ana

AU - Vos, Bart

PY - 2019/6

Y1 - 2019/6

N2 - Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) are increasingly important drivers for businesses’ self-regulation to operate in a sustainable way. We shift the perspective on NGOs from focusing on their advocacy role to focusing on their accountability for having sustainable internal operations. In a multiple case analysis, we explore the question ‘What are the drivers and barriers to sustainable conduct of NGOs that are sustainability advocates?’ Drawing on institutional theory, we obtain novel insights into the legitimacy-seeking motivations for sustainable conduct in the specific context of advocacy NGOs. We found that, affected by its mission, (1) the cultural-cognitive drive is particularly high, with sustainable conduct as an internally ‘taken-for-granted’ behavior, followed by (2) the normative drivers, with the balance between perceived vulnerability of needing to ‘walk the talk’ and the sense of immunity due to lack of external scrutiny, and (3) there are hardly any regulative drivers. Furthermore, these organizations face idiosyncratic trade-offs when balancing investments in their advocacy missions with investments in sustainable operations, reflecting ethical dilemmas. In a broader sense, this research elucidates the way advocates cope in situations of institutional complexity, with conflicting institutional demands between their mission and role-model function.

AB - Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) are increasingly important drivers for businesses’ self-regulation to operate in a sustainable way. We shift the perspective on NGOs from focusing on their advocacy role to focusing on their accountability for having sustainable internal operations. In a multiple case analysis, we explore the question ‘What are the drivers and barriers to sustainable conduct of NGOs that are sustainability advocates?’ Drawing on institutional theory, we obtain novel insights into the legitimacy-seeking motivations for sustainable conduct in the specific context of advocacy NGOs. We found that, affected by its mission, (1) the cultural-cognitive drive is particularly high, with sustainable conduct as an internally ‘taken-for-granted’ behavior, followed by (2) the normative drivers, with the balance between perceived vulnerability of needing to ‘walk the talk’ and the sense of immunity due to lack of external scrutiny, and (3) there are hardly any regulative drivers. Furthermore, these organizations face idiosyncratic trade-offs when balancing investments in their advocacy missions with investments in sustainable operations, reflecting ethical dilemmas. In a broader sense, this research elucidates the way advocates cope in situations of institutional complexity, with conflicting institutional demands between their mission and role-model function.

KW - institutional complexity

KW - legitimacy

KW - multiple cases

KW - non-governmental organizations (NGOs)

KW - sustainability

U2 - 10.1007/s10551-017-3674-4

DO - 10.1007/s10551-017-3674-4

M3 - Article

VL - 157

SP - 483

EP - 501

JO - Journal of Business Ethics

JF - Journal of Business Ethics

SN - 0167-4544

IS - 2

ER -