The atrial fibrillation knowledge scale

Development, validation and results

J.M.L. Hendriks, H.J.G.M. Crijns, R.G. Tieleman, H.J.M. Vrijhoef

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Background
Patients' understanding of the nature and consequences of atrial fibrillation (AF) and appropriate therapy, is essential to optimize AF management. Currently, no valid instrument exists to measure knowledge in AF patients with a combined focus on disease, symptom recognition and therapy. Since there is a need for a specific instrument to detect gaps in the knowledge of AF patients, we developed and assessed the AF knowledge scale.
Methods
The scale was developed based on a standard questionnaire in AF and existing knowledge scales in heart failure. Content validity was evaluated by a panel of 24 cardiology nurses, and 2 cardiologists. Face validity was assessed by judgment of 8 randomly selected AF patients, and construct validity was determined by performing an exploratory factor analysis with varimax rotation, based on 529 patients who completed the AF knowledge scale after one year follow-up. Internal consistency was calculated by means of Cronbach's α. Finally the scale was tested for sensitivity, in terms of ability to distinguish patients' knowledge levels.
Results
The scale consists of 11 items concerning AF in general, symptom recognition, and treatment. Content-, face- and construct validity appeared to be acceptable. Cronbach's α was .58. The scale was able to differentiate between knowledge levels in patients with newly detected AF and after one year follow up.
Conclusion
The instrument is valid and able to distinguish knowledge levels in AF patients. Furthermore, it can be successfully used in an outpatient care setting as an important tool in the tailoring of patient education.
Keywords: Atrial fibrillation, Outpatient care, Patient education, Knowledge, Instrument development
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1422-1428
JournalInternational Journal of Cardiology
Volume168
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Statistical Factor Analysis
Nurses
Recognition (Psychology)
Cardiologists
Surveys and Questionnaires

Cite this

Hendriks, J. M. L., Crijns, H. J. G. M., Tieleman, R. G., & Vrijhoef, H. J. M. (2013). The atrial fibrillation knowledge scale: Development, validation and results. International Journal of Cardiology, 168(2), 1422-1428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.12.047
Hendriks, J.M.L. ; Crijns, H.J.G.M. ; Tieleman, R.G. ; Vrijhoef, H.J.M. / The atrial fibrillation knowledge scale : Development, validation and results. In: International Journal of Cardiology. 2013 ; Vol. 168, No. 2. pp. 1422-1428.
@article{22cc6f0f93a8467cae43956f189aa7ac,
title = "The atrial fibrillation knowledge scale: Development, validation and results",
abstract = "BackgroundPatients' understanding of the nature and consequences of atrial fibrillation (AF) and appropriate therapy, is essential to optimize AF management. Currently, no valid instrument exists to measure knowledge in AF patients with a combined focus on disease, symptom recognition and therapy. Since there is a need for a specific instrument to detect gaps in the knowledge of AF patients, we developed and assessed the AF knowledge scale.MethodsThe scale was developed based on a standard questionnaire in AF and existing knowledge scales in heart failure. Content validity was evaluated by a panel of 24 cardiology nurses, and 2 cardiologists. Face validity was assessed by judgment of 8 randomly selected AF patients, and construct validity was determined by performing an exploratory factor analysis with varimax rotation, based on 529 patients who completed the AF knowledge scale after one year follow-up. Internal consistency was calculated by means of Cronbach's α. Finally the scale was tested for sensitivity, in terms of ability to distinguish patients' knowledge levels.ResultsThe scale consists of 11 items concerning AF in general, symptom recognition, and treatment. Content-, face- and construct validity appeared to be acceptable. Cronbach's α was .58. The scale was able to differentiate between knowledge levels in patients with newly detected AF and after one year follow up.ConclusionThe instrument is valid and able to distinguish knowledge levels in AF patients. Furthermore, it can be successfully used in an outpatient care setting as an important tool in the tailoring of patient education.Keywords: Atrial fibrillation, Outpatient care, Patient education, Knowledge, Instrument development",
author = "J.M.L. Hendriks and H.J.G.M. Crijns and R.G. Tieleman and H.J.M. Vrijhoef",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.12.047",
language = "English",
volume = "168",
pages = "1422--1428",
journal = "International Journal of Cardiology",
issn = "0167-5273",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "2",

}

The atrial fibrillation knowledge scale : Development, validation and results. / Hendriks, J.M.L.; Crijns, H.J.G.M.; Tieleman, R.G.; Vrijhoef, H.J.M.

In: International Journal of Cardiology, Vol. 168, No. 2, 2013, p. 1422-1428.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The atrial fibrillation knowledge scale

T2 - Development, validation and results

AU - Hendriks, J.M.L.

AU - Crijns, H.J.G.M.

AU - Tieleman, R.G.

AU - Vrijhoef, H.J.M.

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - BackgroundPatients' understanding of the nature and consequences of atrial fibrillation (AF) and appropriate therapy, is essential to optimize AF management. Currently, no valid instrument exists to measure knowledge in AF patients with a combined focus on disease, symptom recognition and therapy. Since there is a need for a specific instrument to detect gaps in the knowledge of AF patients, we developed and assessed the AF knowledge scale.MethodsThe scale was developed based on a standard questionnaire in AF and existing knowledge scales in heart failure. Content validity was evaluated by a panel of 24 cardiology nurses, and 2 cardiologists. Face validity was assessed by judgment of 8 randomly selected AF patients, and construct validity was determined by performing an exploratory factor analysis with varimax rotation, based on 529 patients who completed the AF knowledge scale after one year follow-up. Internal consistency was calculated by means of Cronbach's α. Finally the scale was tested for sensitivity, in terms of ability to distinguish patients' knowledge levels.ResultsThe scale consists of 11 items concerning AF in general, symptom recognition, and treatment. Content-, face- and construct validity appeared to be acceptable. Cronbach's α was .58. The scale was able to differentiate between knowledge levels in patients with newly detected AF and after one year follow up.ConclusionThe instrument is valid and able to distinguish knowledge levels in AF patients. Furthermore, it can be successfully used in an outpatient care setting as an important tool in the tailoring of patient education.Keywords: Atrial fibrillation, Outpatient care, Patient education, Knowledge, Instrument development

AB - BackgroundPatients' understanding of the nature and consequences of atrial fibrillation (AF) and appropriate therapy, is essential to optimize AF management. Currently, no valid instrument exists to measure knowledge in AF patients with a combined focus on disease, symptom recognition and therapy. Since there is a need for a specific instrument to detect gaps in the knowledge of AF patients, we developed and assessed the AF knowledge scale.MethodsThe scale was developed based on a standard questionnaire in AF and existing knowledge scales in heart failure. Content validity was evaluated by a panel of 24 cardiology nurses, and 2 cardiologists. Face validity was assessed by judgment of 8 randomly selected AF patients, and construct validity was determined by performing an exploratory factor analysis with varimax rotation, based on 529 patients who completed the AF knowledge scale after one year follow-up. Internal consistency was calculated by means of Cronbach's α. Finally the scale was tested for sensitivity, in terms of ability to distinguish patients' knowledge levels.ResultsThe scale consists of 11 items concerning AF in general, symptom recognition, and treatment. Content-, face- and construct validity appeared to be acceptable. Cronbach's α was .58. The scale was able to differentiate between knowledge levels in patients with newly detected AF and after one year follow up.ConclusionThe instrument is valid and able to distinguish knowledge levels in AF patients. Furthermore, it can be successfully used in an outpatient care setting as an important tool in the tailoring of patient education.Keywords: Atrial fibrillation, Outpatient care, Patient education, Knowledge, Instrument development

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.12.047

DO - 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.12.047

M3 - Article

VL - 168

SP - 1422

EP - 1428

JO - International Journal of Cardiology

JF - International Journal of Cardiology

SN - 0167-5273

IS - 2

ER -