TY - JOUR
T1 - The Big Five Inventory–2
T2 - Replication of psychometric properties in a Dutch adaptation and first evidence for the discriminant predictive validity of the facet scales
AU - Denissen, Jaap J. A.
AU - Geenen, Rinie
AU - Soto, Christopher J.
AU - John, Oliver P.
AU - Van Aken, Marcel A. G.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - This series of studies investigated whether the good psychometric properties of the English version of the Big Five Inventory–2 (BFI–2) could be replicated using its Dutch adaptation. Second, it aimed to further examine the predictive validity of both the Big Five domain and the more specific facet scales of the BFI–2 in a large and representative sample. Results indicated that the structure found in the English version was replicated in the Dutch adaptation. The 60-item BFI–2 was reliable at the level of both domains and facets, as were the abbreviated versions. In terms of validity, the domain scales predicted a broad range of criteria. Examination of preregistered hypotheses regarding the discriminant validity of the facets indicated that experts were able to predict which facets would be most strongly associated with specific criteria. Overall, results confirm the strong psychometric properties of the BFI–2 Big Five domain scales and indicate that theoretically identified facets can be more valid predictors of criteria than other facets of the same domain.
AB - This series of studies investigated whether the good psychometric properties of the English version of the Big Five Inventory–2 (BFI–2) could be replicated using its Dutch adaptation. Second, it aimed to further examine the predictive validity of both the Big Five domain and the more specific facet scales of the BFI–2 in a large and representative sample. Results indicated that the structure found in the English version was replicated in the Dutch adaptation. The 60-item BFI–2 was reliable at the level of both domains and facets, as were the abbreviated versions. In terms of validity, the domain scales predicted a broad range of criteria. Examination of preregistered hypotheses regarding the discriminant validity of the facets indicated that experts were able to predict which facets would be most strongly associated with specific criteria. Overall, results confirm the strong psychometric properties of the BFI–2 Big Five domain scales and indicate that theoretically identified facets can be more valid predictors of criteria than other facets of the same domain.
KW - ADULTHOOD
KW - BANDWIDTH
KW - DOMAINS
KW - FIDELITY
KW - GENDER-DIFFERENCES
KW - MODEL
KW - PERSONALITY-TRAITS
UR - https://app-eu.readspeaker.com/cgi-bin/rsent?customerid=10118&lang=en_us&readclass=rs_readArea&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.tandfonline.com%2Fdoi%2Ffull%2F10.1080%2F00223891.2018.1539004
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060062209&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/00223891.2018.1539004
DO - 10.1080/00223891.2018.1539004
M3 - Article
SN - 0022-3891
VL - 102
SP - 309
EP - 324
JO - Journal of Personality Assessment
JF - Journal of Personality Assessment
IS - 3
ER -