The brain perceives/infers

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterScientificpeer-review

49 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Talk of ‘brains deciding’, ‘brains inferring’ or ‘brains perceiving’ is common in contemporary cognitive science and neuroscience. A number of authors (most notably Peter Hacker and Maxwell Bennett) argue that such talk commits a category mistake; deciding, making inferences or perceiving are abilities properly ascribed to humans and not to human subsystems or subparts. Here I will argue that ascribing such properties to human brains or cognitive systems within the brain is proper. I will argue that ‘inferring’ or ‘perceiving’ are best conceptualized as functional terms. Since most functions we know of are multiply realizable, this opens the door for atypical inferences and perceptions that can be ascribed to various organisms and their subsystems.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationWittgenstein and the Cognitive Science of Religion
Subtitle of host publicationInterpreting Human Nature and the Mind
EditorsRobert Vinten
Place of PublicationLondon
PublisherBloomsbury Academic
Chapter4
Pages53-71
Number of pages18
ISBN (Electronic)9781350329362
ISBN (Print)9781350329355
Publication statusPublished - 2023

Keywords

  • Peter Hacker
  • Functionalism
  • Inference
  • Perception
  • Cognitive neuroscience
  • Mereological Fallacy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The brain perceives/infers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this