Abstract
Talk of ‘brains deciding’, ‘brains inferring’ or ‘brains perceiving’ is common in contemporary cognitive science and neuroscience. A number of authors (most notably Peter Hacker and Maxwell Bennett) argue that such talk commits a category mistake; deciding, making inferences or perceiving are abilities properly ascribed to humans and not to human subsystems or subparts. Here I will argue that ascribing such properties to human brains or cognitive systems within the brain is proper. I will argue that ‘inferring’ or ‘perceiving’ are best conceptualized as functional terms. Since most functions we know of are multiply realizable, this opens the door for atypical inferences and perceptions that can be ascribed to various organisms and their subsystems.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Wittgenstein and the Cognitive Science of Religion |
Subtitle of host publication | Interpreting Human Nature and the Mind |
Editors | Robert Vinten |
Place of Publication | London |
Publisher | Bloomsbury Academic |
Chapter | 4 |
Pages | 53-71 |
Number of pages | 18 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 9781350329362 |
ISBN (Print) | 9781350329355 |
Publication status | Published - 2023 |
Keywords
- Peter Hacker
- Functionalism
- Inference
- Perception
- Cognitive neuroscience
- Mereological Fallacy